LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-37457: An off-by-one out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the bgp_flowspec_op_decode() function (bgpd/bgp_flowspec...

An off-by-one out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the bgp_flowspec_op_decode() function (bgpd/bgp_flowspec_util.c) of FRRouting (FRR) stable/10.0 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via supplying a crafted FlowSpec component.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can crash or disrupt FRRouting BGP services when they process a specially crafted FlowSpec component. For organizations relying on FRR for routing, the business impact is availability loss, not data theft. The bundle does not show active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize patching where FRR supports production routing or has exposed BGP peers. The issue is availability-focused, but routing outages can create broad business disruption.

Technical view

CVE-2026-37457 is an off-by-one out-of-bounds write in FRR bgp_flowspec_op_decode() in bgpd/bgp_flowspec_util.c. The CVSS 3.1 vector is network-accessible, low-complexity, unauthenticated, no user interaction, with high availability impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where FRRouting stable/10.0 bgpd processes BGP FlowSpec components. The provided affected-product metadata is incomplete, so teams should verify packaged FRR versions through FRRouting and Red Hat advisory data.

Exploitation context

The source bundle rates this as remotely reachable DoS. CISA KEV is false, and no provided source states active exploitation. Treat internet-facing or untrusted-peer BGP FlowSpec processing as higher operational risk.

Researcher notes

The bundle identifies CWE-787 and the vulnerable function, but affected CPEs are listed as n/a. Avoid assuming broader version impact without vendor confirmation. No exploit details or active exploitation evidence are provided.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply FRRouting or distribution vendor updates covering CVE-2026-37457.
  • Review the linked Red Hat advisories for package-specific remediation.
  • Restrict BGP sessions to trusted peers where operationally possible.
  • Review FlowSpec acceptance policies and disable unnecessary exposure.
  • Monitor bgpd stability and crash alerts until remediation is complete.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems running FRRouting or vendor-packaged FRR bgpd.
  • Confirm deployed FRR versions against FRRouting and Red Hat advisory data.
  • Determine whether bgpd accepts BGP FlowSpec components.
  • Check whether any exposed BGP peers are untrusted or internet reachable.
  • Validate remediation by confirming patched package or commit lineage.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
10

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-787: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-37457 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
9Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6CISA-ADP
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-37457Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
redhat-SADPfrr: denial of service via crafted FlowSpec component
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-05-01T18:00:52.735Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-05-01T00:00:00.000Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-787 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Write

Out-of-bounds Write represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.