LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-3706: mkj Dropbear S Range Check curve25519.c unpackneg signature verification

A vulnerability was determined in mkj Dropbear up to 2025.89. Impacted is the function unpackneg of the file src/curve25519.c of the component S Range Check. This manipulation causes improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack can be initiated remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is considered difficult. The actual existence of this vulnerability is currently in question. Patch name: fdec3c90a15447bd538641d85e5a3e3ac981011d. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The project maintainer explains: "Signature Malleability is not exploitable in SSH protocol. (...) [A] PoC doesn't exist for SSH implementation, but rather it's against the internal API."

MediumCVSS 6.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-3706 concerns Dropbear SSH cryptographic signature verification in curve25519 code. Public sources rate it medium, but also state the vulnerability’s real-world existence is questioned. The maintainer says the reported signature malleability is not exploitable in the SSH protocol and relates to an internal API rather than an SSH proof of concept.

Executive priority

Treat as a planned remediation item, not an emergency, unless Dropbear is internet-facing or embedded in critical products. The practical SSH risk is disputed, but patching is prudent because the issue affects cryptographic verification logic.

Technical view

The report names function unpackneg in src/curve25519.c, component S Range Check, causing improper cryptographic signature verification. It is network-reachable with high attack complexity, no privileges, and limited integrity impact under CVSS 4.0 score 6.3. A referenced patch commit is fdec3c90a15447bd538641d85e5a3e3ac981011d.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where mkj Dropbear versions 2025.0 through 2025.89 are deployed. Validate embedded Linux, appliances, firmware, and systems using Dropbear SSH. Public data does not provide CPEs or downstream vendor package status.

Exploitation context

No active exploitation is supported by the provided sources, and KEV is false. VulDB says remote attack initiation is possible but difficult. The maintainer disputes practical SSH exploitability, stating no SSH implementation PoC exists and the issue targets an internal API.

Researcher notes

Key uncertainty is exploitability. Sources describe improper signature verification, but the maintainer states SSH protocol exploitation is not shown. Focus analysis on whether your deployed code exposes the affected internal API path or only standard Dropbear SSH behavior.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify Dropbear deployments and versions, including embedded and appliance uses.
  • Apply the referenced upstream patch where applicable.
  • Check Dropbear and downstream vendor advisories for supported fixed releases.
  • Prioritize internet-facing Dropbear services until vendor status is confirmed.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Dropbear is installed and externally reachable.
  • Record exact Dropbear version and package source.
  • Check whether commit fdec3c90a15447bd538641d85e5a3e3ac981011d is present.
  • Review vendor firmware or OS advisories for backported fixes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
10

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-345: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-347: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-3706 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
9Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-3706Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
mkjDropbear2025.0, 2025.1, 2025.2, 2025.3, 2025.4, 2025.5, 2025.6, 2025.7, 2025.8, 2025.9, 2025.10, 2025.11, 2025.12, 2025.13, 2025.14, 2025.15, 2025.16, 2025.17, 2025.18, 2025.19, 2025.20, 2025.21, 2025.22, 2025.23, 2025.24, 2025.25, 2025.26, 2025.27, 2025.28, 2025.29, 2025.30, 2025.31, 2025.32, 2025.33, 2025.34, 2025.35, 2025.36, 2025.37, 2025.38, 2025.39, 2025.40, 2025.41, 2025.42, 2025.43, 2025.44, 2025.45, 2025.46, 2025.47, 2025.48, 2025.49, 2025.50, 2025.51, 2025.52, 2025.53, 2025.54, 2025.55, 2025.56, 2025.57, 2025.58, 2025.59, 2025.60, 2025.61, 2025.62, 2025.63, 2025.64, 2025.65, 2025.66, 2025.67, 2025.68, 2025.69, 2025.70, 2025.71, 2025.72, 2025.73, 2025.74, 2025.75, 2025.76, 2025.77, 2025.78, 2025.79, 2025.80, 2025.81, 2025.82, 2025.83, 2025.84, 2025.85, 2025.86, 2025.87, 2025.88, 2025.89Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-345 · source CWE mapping

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-347 · source CWE mapping

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.