LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-3478: Content Syndication Toolkit <= 1.3 - Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery via 'url' Parameter

The Content Syndication Toolkit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3 via the redux_p AJAX action in the bundled ReduxFramework library. The plugin registers a proxy endpoint (wp_ajax_nopriv_redux_p) that is accessible to unauthenticated users. The proxy() method in the Redux_P class takes a URL directly from $_GET['url'] without any validation (the regex is set to /.*/ which matches all URLs) and passes it to wp_remote_request(), which does not have built-in SSRF protection like wp_safe_remote_request(). There is no authentication check, no nonce verification, and no URL restriction. The response from the requested URL is then returned to the attacker, making this a full-read SSRF. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application, which can be used to query and modify information from internal services, scan internal network ports, or interact with cloud metadata endpoints.

HighCVSS 7.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-3478 lets anyone on the internet use an affected WordPress site as a proxy to request other URLs. This can expose internal systems or cloud metadata reachable from the web server. The issue affects Content Syndication Toolkit versions up to 1.3 according to the provided description. No cited source confirms active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize review of public WordPress sites using this plugin, especially in cloud or internally connected environments. If present, disable or contain it until an official fix or guidance is confirmed.

Technical view

The plugin registers an unauthenticated AJAX proxy action, wp_ajax_nopriv_redux_p. Redux_P::proxy() accepts $_GET['url'], permits all URLs, uses wp_remote_request() rather than wp_safe_remote_request(), and returns the response. This is full-read SSRF with CVSS 7.2 and CWE-918.

Likely exposure

Internet-facing WordPress sites running Content Syndication Toolkit 1.3 or earlier are the primary exposure. Risk is higher where the WordPress server can reach internal applications, management interfaces, or cloud metadata services.

Exploitation context

Attackers need no account or user interaction. The vulnerability can support internal network reconnaissance, reading reachable internal responses, or interacting with services accessible from the WordPress host. KEV is false and the supplied sources do not report exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The source bundle includes code references showing the proxy class and permissive URL handling. The affected metadata appears inconsistent, listing version “0” and defaultStatus “unaffected,” while the description states all versions through 1.3. Validate against the CVE and Wordfence records before final asset scoping.

Mitigation direction

  • Disable or remove Content Syndication Toolkit where not business-critical.
  • Check vendor, Wordfence, and WordPress plugin sources for a fixed release or official workaround.
  • Restrict unauthenticated access to the vulnerable AJAX action if the plugin must remain enabled.
  • Limit WordPress server egress to required destinations only.
  • Block access from WordPress servers to metadata and internal management endpoints.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Content Syndication Toolkit and record installed versions.
  • Treat version 1.3 or earlier as affected per the provided vulnerability description.
  • Review web logs for unauthenticated admin-ajax requests invoking redux_p.
  • Look for unusual outbound requests from WordPress servers to internal or metadata addresses.
  • Confirm remediation status against vendor or trusted vulnerability advisories.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-3478 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N3.92.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.2High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-3478Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
benmoodyContent Syndication Toolkit0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.