LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-34755: vLLM Affected by Denial of Service via Unbounded Frame Count in video/jpeg Base64 Processing

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). From 0.7.0 to before 0.19.0, the VideoMediaIO.load_base64() method at vllm/multimodal/media/video.py splits video/jpeg data URLs by comma to extract individual JPEG frames, but does not enforce a frame count limit. The num_frames parameter (default: 32), which is enforced by the load_bytes() code path, is completely bypassed in the video/jpeg base64 path. An attacker can send a single API request containing thousands of comma-separated base64-encoded JPEG frames, causing the server to decode all frames into memory and crash with OOM. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.19.0.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability lets a logged-in attacker crash some vLLM servers by sending one oversized multimodal request containing many base64 JPEG frames. The issue is availability-only, but an outage in an LLM inference service can disrupt customer-facing AI features, internal automation, or dependent applications.

Executive priority

Treat as a timely service availability fix for exposed AI inference environments. Prioritize internet-facing, shared, or business-critical vLLM deployments first; lower urgency applies to isolated systems without multimodal video input.

Technical view

In vLLM 0.7.0 through versions before 0.19.0, VideoMediaIO.load_base64() handles video/jpeg data URLs by splitting comma-separated frames without enforcing num_frames. The load_bytes() path enforces the default frame limit, but this base64 path bypasses it, allowing excessive frame decoding into memory and possible OOM crash.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where vLLM versions >=0.7.0 and <0.19.0 accept multimodal API requests with video/jpeg base64 content from authenticated or otherwise privileged users.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show KEV listing or cited active exploitation. CVSS indicates network access, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact, with no confidentiality or integrity impact.

Researcher notes

The key code-path distinction is base64 video/jpeg parsing versus byte-based loading. Evidence supports uncontrolled resource consumption through unbounded frame processing. Public sources name the fixed version but do not provide evidence of in-the-wild exploitation in this bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade vLLM to 0.19.0 or later.
  • Apply relevant Red Hat errata where using Red Hat-packaged components.
  • Review vendor guidance before relying on local workarounds.
  • Restrict vLLM API access to trusted authenticated clients.
  • Monitor and limit unusually large multimodal requests where supported.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory deployed vLLM versions and flag >=0.7.0, <0.19.0.
  • Confirm whether affected services accept video/jpeg base64 multimodal input.
  • Verify vLLM is upgraded to 0.19.0 or vendor-fixed packaging.
  • Review logs for abnormal large video/jpeg base64 requests and OOM crashes.
  • Check Red Hat advisory status for any affected downstream products.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-770: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-34755 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.83.6GitHub_M
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.83.6redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-34755Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPvLLM: vLLM: Denial of Service due to excessive video frame processing
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-04-06T16:02:21.718Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-04-06T15:38:53.201Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
vllm-projectvllm>= 0.7.0, < 0.19.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-770 · source CWE mapping

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.