LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-34341: Windows Link-Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Double free in Windows Link-Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

HighCVSS 7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A logged-in attacker with limited existing access could abuse a memory-management flaw in Windows LLDP to gain higher privileges. Successful exploitation could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The attack is local, requires privileges, and has high complexity, which reduces—but does not eliminate—business risk.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority patching issue, especially where untrusted or numerous low-privilege users have local access. It is not described as remotely exploitable or actively exploited. Address it within the normal high-severity remediation window, accelerating critical shared systems and environments with weak account controls.

Technical view

CVE-2026-34341 is a CWE-415 double-free vulnerability in Windows Link-Layer Discovery Protocol. Its CVSS 3.1 score is 7.0 (high): local access, high attack complexity, low privileges, and no user interaction are required. Successful exploitation can produce high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact without changing security scope.

Likely exposure

Exposure spans the listed Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server releases, including several Server Core installations. Organizations should compare deployed editions, versions, and patch status with Microsoft's advisory. The source bundle does not establish whether LLDP configuration changes exposure.

Exploitation context

The attacker must already be authorized locally with low privileges, and exploitation has high complexity. No user interaction is required. The source bundle marks the CVE as absent from KEV and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation; this does not prove exploitation is impossible or nonexistent.

Researcher notes

The supplied evidence identifies the vulnerable condition as a double free but does not describe the affected code path, trigger, exploitation mechanics, mitigations, or specific update identifiers. Avoid assuming LLDP can simply be disabled or that disabling it fully mitigates exposure; verify all remediation and applicability details in Microsoft's advisory.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Microsoft's CVE advisory for applicable security updates and deployment requirements.
  • Apply the relevant Microsoft security updates to affected, supported Windows systems.
  • Prioritize privileged workstations, shared servers, and systems where low-privilege users can authenticate.
  • Use normal change control and test updates before broad production deployment.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Windows editions, versions, build numbers, and Server Core installations.
  • Compare each system against Microsoft's affected-product and security-update information.
  • Confirm applicable updates installed successfully and systems completed any required restart.
  • Re-scan patched assets and investigate update failures or unsupported affected systems.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-415: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-34341 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C15.9microsoft

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-34341Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 160710.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 180910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 21H210.0.19044.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 10 Version 22H210.0.19045.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 23H210.0.22631.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 23H210.0.22631.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 24H210.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 Version 25H210.0.26200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows 11 version 26H110.0.28000.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 20126.2.9200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)6.2.9200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R26.3.9600.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)6.3.9600.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201610.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)10.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)10.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202210.0.20348.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation)10.0.25398.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202510.0.26100.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2025 (Server Core installation)10.0.26100.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-415 · source CWE mapping

Double Free

Double Free represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.