LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-33997: Moby: Off-by-one error in plugin privilege validation

Moby is an open source container framework. Prior to version 29.3.1, a security vulnerability has been detected that allows plugins privilege validation to be bypassed during docker plugin install. Due to an error in the daemon's privilege comparison logic, the daemon may incorrectly accept a privilege set that differs from the one approved by the user. Plugins that request exactly one privilege are also affected, because no comparison is performed at all. This issue has been patched in version 29.3.1.

HighCVSS 8.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Moby before 29.3.1 can accept Docker plugin privileges that differ from what a user approved during plugin installation. This can let a malicious or compromised plugin gain unexpected capabilities on a container host. The issue is high severity, but the provided sources do not show active exploitation.

Executive priority

Prioritize patching container hosts that allow Docker plugin installation or rely on third-party plugins. For tightly controlled environments with no plugin use, handle through normal high-severity maintenance while verifying exposure.

Technical view

An off-by-one error in the daemon's plugin privilege comparison can bypass validation during docker plugin install. Plugins requesting exactly one privilege are affected because no comparison is performed. The CVSS vector indicates network attack surface, low complexity, high privileges, required user interaction, changed scope, and high impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on hosts running Moby before 29.3.1 where Docker plugins can be installed, especially from third-party or less controlled sources. Environments that do not use Docker plugins still should verify package versions, but practical exposure appears narrower.

Exploitation context

The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no evidence of active exploitation. Abuse would require a plugin installation approval path and a privilege mismatch accepted by the daemon. Do not treat this as a generic container escape without matching plugin-install conditions.

Researcher notes

The key behavior is privilege validation bypass in daemon comparison logic, including a single-privilege edge case. Sources identify CWE-193 and CWE-266, Moby versions before 29.3.1, and patch availability in 29.3.1. Public evidence in the bundle is insufficient to claim exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Moby or Docker packages to version 29.3.1 or later.
  • Apply relevant Red Hat advisories where using vendor-packaged components.
  • Restrict Docker plugin installation to trusted administrators and approved sources.
  • Review installed plugins and remove unnecessary or untrusted plugins.
  • Monitor vendor guidance for distribution-specific fixes or backports.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory hosts running Moby or Docker engine versions before 29.3.1.
  • Identify systems where Docker plugins are installed or plugin installation is permitted.
  • Confirm vendor package status against Red Hat or distribution advisories.
  • Review change records for recent third-party Docker plugin installs.
  • Verify remediation by confirming patched engine package versions.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
9

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-193: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-266: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-33997 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
9Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.4CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.76redhat-SADP
6.8CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N1.65.2GitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.4High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-33997Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPmoby: docker: github.com/moby/moby: Moby: Privilege validation bypass during plugin installation
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-03-31T03:01:29.529Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-03-31T01:36:51.404Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
mobymoby< 29.3.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-193 · source CWE mapping

Off-by-one Error

Off-by-one Error represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-266 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Privilege Assignment

Incorrect Privilege Assignment represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.