LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-3377: Tenda F453 SafeUrlFilter fromSafeUrlFilter buffer overflow

A vulnerability was detected in Tenda F453 1.0.0.3. Affected by this issue is the function fromSafeUrlFilter of the file /goform/SafeUrlFilter. Performing a manipulation of the argument page results in buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

CriticalCVSS 9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-3377 is a critical buffer overflow in Tenda F453 firmware 1.0.0.3. A remote authenticated attacker could potentially take full control of the device. Public exploit material is referenced, but CISA KEV status is false in the provided sources, so active exploitation is not confirmed.

Executive priority

High priority for organizations using Tenda F453. Treat as urgent if management access is exposed beyond trusted administrators. If no patch is available, reduce exposure immediately and consider replacement planning.

Technical view

The flaw affects fromSafeUrlFilter in /goform/SafeUrlFilter. Manipulating the page argument can trigger a buffer overflow. VulDB rates it CVSS 2.0 9.0 with network access, low complexity, and authentication required. Affected product evidence is limited to Tenda F453 firmware 1.0.0.3.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Tenda F453 administration interfaces are reachable by untrusted users, especially over the internet or shared networks. Authentication is required per the provided CVSS vector, but weak or reused router credentials would increase practical risk.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says exploit material is public and may be used. No provided source confirms active exploitation in the wild, and KEV is false. The issue should still be treated urgently because compromise of edge network devices can affect traffic routing, access, and persistence.

Researcher notes

Evidence comes mainly from CVE/VulDB records and a public GitHub reference. The provided data names the vulnerable endpoint and parameter, but does not include vendor remediation or confirmed exploitation. Avoid assuming broader Tenda model impact without additional evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any Tenda F453 devices and confirm firmware version.
  • Restrict management access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Disable remote administration if not explicitly required.
  • Change default or weak administrative credentials.
  • Check Tenda guidance for firmware updates or official mitigation.
  • Replace unsupported devices if no vendor fix is available.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory network edge devices for Tenda F453 models.
  • Verify whether firmware version 1.0.0.3 is present.
  • Review firewall rules limiting access to device administration.
  • Check logs for suspicious administrative access attempts.
  • Monitor vendor and CVE sources for updated remediation guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-3377 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (2.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 2.0CriticalAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR810VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.8CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R2.85.9VulDB
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:PVulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-3377Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
TendaF4531.0.0.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.