LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-33453: Apache Camel: CoAP URI Query Parameter to Exchange Header Injection in camel-coap Allows Single-Packet Pre-Auth Remote Code Execution

Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes vulnerability in Apache Camel Camel-Coap component. Apache Camel's camel-coap component is vulnerable to Camel message header injection, leading to remote code execution when routes forward CoAP requests to header-sensitive producers (e.g. camel-exec) The camel-coap component maps incoming CoAP request URI query parameters directly into Camel Exchange In message headers without applying any HeaderFilterStrategy.   Specifically, CamelCoapResource.handleRequest() iterates over OptionSet.getUriQuery() and calls camelExchange.getIn().setHeader(...) for every query parameter. CoAPEndpoint extends DefaultEndpoint rather than DefaultHeaderFilterStrategyEndpoint, and CoAPComponent does not implement HeaderFilterStrategyComponent; the component contains no references to HeaderFilterStrategy at all. As a result, an unauthenticated attacker who can send a single CoAP UDP packet to a Camel route consuming from coap:// can inject arbitrary Camel internal headers (those prefixed with Camel*) into the Exchange. When the route delivers the message to a header-sensitive producer such as camel-exec, camel-sql, camel-bean, camel-file, or template components (camel-freemarker, camel-velocity), the injected headers can alter the producer's behavior. In the case of camel-exec, the CamelExecCommandExecutable and CamelExecCommandArgs headers override the executable and arguments configured on the endpoint, resulting in arbitrary OS command execution under the privileges of the Camel process. The producer's output is written back to the Exchange body and returned in the CoAP response payload by CamelCoapResource, giving the attacker an interactive RCE channel without any need for out-of-band exfiltration.                                                                                                                                                                         Exploitation prerequisites are minimal: a single unauthenticated UDP datagram to the CoAP port (default 5683). CoAP (RFC 7252) has no built-in authentication, and DTLS is optional and disabled by default. Because the protocol is UDP-based, HTTP-layer WAF/IDS controls do not apply. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.14.0 through 4.14.5, from 4.18.0 before 4.18.1, 4.19.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.18.1 or 4.19.0, fixing the issue.

CriticalCVSS 10Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A vulnerable Apache Camel CoAP route can let an unauthenticated network attacker change internal Camel headers. If that route later sends the message to components that trust those headers, the attacker may influence backend behavior, including command execution with camel-exec. Risk depends on exposed CoAP consumers and downstream route design.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for any internet- or partner-reachable Camel CoAP service. The business impact can reach full process compromise, but only where the vulnerable component and risky route pattern exist.

Technical view

camel-coap maps CoAP URI query parameters into Camel Exchange headers without a HeaderFilterStrategy. Arbitrary Camel-prefixed headers can reach header-sensitive producers such as exec, SQL, bean, file, or template components. The advisory assigns CVSS 10.0 and lists Apache Camel 4.14.0-4.14.5, 4.18.0 before 4.18.1, and inconsistent 4.19.0 wording.

Likely exposure

Highest exposure is Apache Camel deployments using org.apache.camel:camel-coap consumer routes reachable over UDP, especially from untrusted networks, and forwarding messages to header-sensitive producers. Non-CoAP Camel routes are not described as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The bundle states unauthenticated network exploitation is possible under the affected route conditions. It does not cite active exploitation, and KEV is false. CoAP uses UDP, so exposure may bypass HTTP-focused controls.

Researcher notes

Focus analysis on header propagation from camel-coap into downstream producers. The provided data supports the root cause and impact pattern, but source wording conflicts on 4.19.0, so version validation should reference the Apache advisory directly.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Apache Camel to the vendor-recommended fixed version: 4.18.1 or 4.19.0.
  • Confirm vendor guidance because the source text is inconsistent about 4.19.0 affected status.
  • Restrict CoAP listener exposure to trusted networks where immediate upgrade is delayed.
  • Review routes that pass CoAP messages to exec, SQL, bean, file, or template producers.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory dependencies for org.apache.camel:camel-coap and Apache Camel 4.14.x, 4.18.0, or 4.19.0.
  • Identify routes consuming from coap:// endpoints and their reachable UDP ports.
  • Trace downstream producers for header-sensitive behavior after CoAP message ingestion.
  • Verify deployed runtime versions match the vendor-advised fixed release.
  • Check whether CoAP endpoints are exposed to untrusted network segments.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-915: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-33453 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
10 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
3ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
10CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H3.96CISA-ADP
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.25.9redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

10Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-33453Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
redhat-SADPApache Camel: camel-coap: Apache Camel camel-coap: Remote code execution via CoAP URI query parameter injection
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-04-27T11:01:08.808Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-04-27T09:58:48.787Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Apache Software FoundationApache Camelorg.apache.camel:camel-coap, 4.14.0, 4.18.0, 4.19.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-915 · source CWE mapping

Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes

Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.