CVE-2026-33211: Tekton Pipelines git resolver has path traversal that allows reading arbitrary files from the resolver pod
Tekton Pipelines project provides k8s-style resources for declaring CI/CD-style pipelines. Starting in version 1.0.0 and prior to versions 1.0.1, 1.3.3, 1.6.1, 1.9.2, and 1.10.2, the Tekton Pipelines git resolver is vulnerable to path traversal via the `pathInRepo` parameter. A tenant with permission to create `ResolutionRequests` (e.g. by creating `TaskRuns` or `PipelineRuns` that use the git resolver) can read arbitrary files from the resolver pod's filesystem, including ServiceAccount tokens. The file contents are returned base64-encoded in `resolutionrequest.status.data`. Versions 1.0.1, 1.3.3, 1.6.1, 1.9.2, and 1.10.2 contain a patch.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A permitted Tekton tenant can abuse the git resolver to read files from its pod, including Kubernetes ServiceAccount tokens. Those credentials could enable further access according to their assigned permissions. The issue crosses tenant and workload trust boundaries, making rapid remediation important in shared CI/CD environments.
Executive priority
Treat this as an urgent CI/CD platform issue, especially in multi-tenant clusters. Patch promptly, restrict resolver request creation during remediation, and investigate possible token exposure. Priority may be reduced only after confirming no affected version or accessible git resolver exists.
Technical view
CVE-2026-33211 is a CWE-22 path traversal in the git resolver’s `pathInRepo` handling. A user able to create ResolutionRequests, directly or through qualifying TaskRuns or PipelineRuns, can retrieve arbitrary resolver-pod files. Contents appear base64-encoded in `resolutionrequest.status.data`. CVSS 3.1 is 9.6: network-accessible, low complexity, low privileges, no interaction, and changed scope.
Likely exposure
Exposure requires Tekton Pipelines in an affected range, use or availability of the git resolver, and tenant permission to create ResolutionRequests directly or indirectly. Affected ranges are 1.0.0, 1.1.0–1.3.2, 1.4.0–1.6.0, 1.7.0–1.9.1, and 1.10.0–1.10.1.
Exploitation context
The supplied record does not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked as CISA KEV. Exploitation nevertheless requires only low privileges and no user interaction. The immediate capability is file disclosure; theft of ServiceAccount tokens may create follow-on risk depending on token validity and RBAC permissions.
Researcher notes
The important trust boundary is ResolutionRequest creation, including indirect creation through git-resolver TaskRuns or PipelineRuns. Base64 encoding is transport representation, not protection. Assess which identities can read request status and what the resolver ServiceAccount can access. The supplied sources establish the disclosure primitive and patch versions, but not observed attacks.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade to 1.0.1, 1.3.3, 1.6.1, 1.9.2, 1.10.2, or a later supported release.
Apply relevant Red Hat errata when using affected Red Hat-distributed components.
Until upgraded, restrict who can create ResolutionRequests or resolver-backed TaskRuns and PipelineRuns.
Rotate resolver-pod ServiceAccount credentials if exploitation is suspected, then review permissions reachable through those credentials.
Validation and detection
Inventory deployed Tekton Pipelines versions and compare them with every listed affected range.
Confirm whether the git resolver is installed, enabled, or referenced by tenant workloads.
Review RBAC for direct and indirect permission to create ResolutionRequests.
Audit ResolutionRequests for suspicious `pathInRepo` values and unexpected data returned through status.
Check resolver ServiceAccount activity for anomalous API access, then verify upgraded workloads use patched images.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-22: File access and web shell behavior lookup
File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.