LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-32989: Precurio Intranet Portal 4.4: Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to arbitrary file upload

Precurio Intranet Portal 4.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to induce authenticated users to submit crafted requests to a profile update endpoint handling file uploads. Attackers can exploit this to upload executable files to web-accessible locations, leading to arbitrary code execution in the context of the web server.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Precurio Intranet Portal 4.4 has a high-risk flaw where an attacker could trick a signed-in user into submitting an unwanted profile update that uploads a file. If executable files are accepted and reachable by the web server, this can become code execution on the portal server.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for any exposed Precurio 4.4 deployment because successful exploitation could compromise the portal server. Treat as urgent, but not confirmed actively exploited based on the supplied evidence.

Technical view

The issue combines CSRF with unsafe file upload handling on a profile update path. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.8, with network attack vector, low complexity, no attacker privileges, and required user interaction. The source bundle identifies CWE-352 and CWE-434 for Precurio Intranet Portal 4.4 only.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to organizations running Precurio Intranet Portal 4.4. Risk is higher where the portal is reachable from untrusted networks, users stay authenticated, and profile uploads can place executable content in web-accessible locations.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other cited evidence of active exploitation. A Packet Storm reference is tagged exploit, but its provided title concerns Textpattern, not Precurio, so exploit evidence is inconsistent and should be treated cautiously.

Researcher notes

The affected set names only Precurio Intranet Portal 4.4, default status unaffected. No patch version is provided in the bundle. The Packet Storm reference appears mismatched by title, reducing confidence in public exploit attribution.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Precurio guidance for a fixed version or vendor-recommended workaround.
  • Restrict portal access to trusted networks or VPN until remediated.
  • Disable or tightly restrict profile file uploads where operationally feasible.
  • Block executable uploads and ensure uploaded files cannot execute server-side.
  • Enforce CSRF protections on authenticated state-changing requests.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Precurio deployments and confirm whether version 4.4 is present.
  • Review upload directories for unexpected executable or script-like files.
  • Check logs for unusual profile update and upload activity.
  • Verify profile updates require valid anti-CSRF tokens.
  • Confirm uploaded files are stored outside executable web paths.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-434: File access and web shell behavior lookup

File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-32989 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9VulnCheck
8.6CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-32989Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
PrecurioPrecurio Intranet Portal4.4unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-434 · source CWE mapping

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.