LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-32980: OpenClaw < 2026.3.13 - Resource Exhaustion via Unauthenticated Telegram Webhook Request

OpenClaw before 2026.3.13 reads and buffers Telegram webhook request bodies before validating the x-telegram-bot-api-secret-token header, allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resources. Attackers can send POST requests to the webhook endpoint to force memory consumption, socket time, and JSON parsing work before authentication validation occurs.

HighCVSS 8.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

OpenClaw versions before 2026.3.13 can spend memory and processing time on Telegram webhook requests before confirming they are legitimate. An unauthenticated internet user could pressure the service into resource exhaustion, causing availability loss for affected deployments.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for internet-exposed OpenClaw systems using Telegram webhooks. The main business risk is service disruption, not data theft, but unauthenticated availability attacks can still affect customer operations and incident response capacity.

Technical view

The webhook handler buffers and parses request bodies before validating the x-telegram-bot-api-secret-token header. This creates CWE-770 uncontrolled resource consumption. The supplied CVSS 4.0 score is 8.7, driven by network reachability, no required privileges, low attack complexity, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where OpenClaw before 2026.3.13 has a Telegram webhook endpoint reachable from untrusted networks. Deployments without Telegram webhook use, or already updated to 2026.3.13 or later, appear less exposed based on the bundle.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. The vulnerability is still concerning because it is unauthenticated, network reachable, and affects availability through resource exhaustion before authentication validation.

Researcher notes

Use the vendor advisory, CVE record, VulnCheck advisory, and patch commit as primary evidence. The bundle identifies CWE-770 and the vulnerable pre-auth processing pattern, but does not provide evidence of exploitation in the wild.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade OpenClaw to 2026.3.13 or later.
  • Review the GitHub advisory and patch commit for vendor-confirmed remediation details.
  • If upgrade is delayed, check vendor guidance for supported temporary controls.
  • Reduce unnecessary public exposure of the Telegram webhook endpoint where operationally possible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OpenClaw deployments and confirm versions are not below 2026.3.13.
  • Identify whether Telegram webhook endpoints are reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review service metrics for abnormal memory, socket, or request-body processing pressure.
  • Confirm the fixed handler validates the secret token before expensive body processing.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-770: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-32980 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-32980Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
OpenClawOpenClaw0, 2026.3.13unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-770 · source CWE mapping

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.