Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
OpenClaw versions before 2026.3.12 can treat certain Feishu group reaction events as private chats when chat_type is missing. That can let an unauthorised actor bypass group-level restrictions intended to limit who can trigger bot behavior or require direct mentions.
Executive priority
Treat this as urgent for any OpenClaw deployment using Feishu group chat automation. The vulnerability weakens authorization controls that may protect sensitive bot actions, and the vendor-version range indicates affected systems should move to 2026.3.12 or later.
Technical view
This is a CWE-863 authorization bypass. Feishu reaction events with omitted chat_type are misclassified as p2p instead of group chat events, bypassing groupAllowFrom and requireMention protections for reaction-derived group chat workflows. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8, with network attack vector and no privileges or user interaction required.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to OpenClaw deployments before 2026.3.12 that integrate with Feishu and process reaction-derived events in group chats. Risk is higher where groupAllowFrom or requireMention is relied on as an authorization boundary.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not state active exploitation, and the bundle marks KEV as false. The issue is still high urgency because the documented impact includes full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact under CVSS.
Researcher notes
The evidence identifies the bug class, affected condition, security controls bypassed, CVSS vector, and affected version range. It does not provide public exploit details in the supplied bundle. Focus validation on event classification behavior when Feishu omits chat_type.
Mitigation direction
- Upgrade OpenClaw to 2026.3.12 or later, based on the affected-version range.
- Review vendor advisory GHSA-m69h-jm2f-2pv8 for any additional guidance.
- Temporarily restrict Feishu reaction-derived automation if upgrade timing is uncertain.
- Audit groupAllowFrom and requireMention assumptions for Feishu group workflows.
Validation and detection
- Inventory OpenClaw versions and identify any instance older than 2026.3.12.
- Confirm whether Feishu integration and group reaction event handling are enabled.
- Review bot logs for group reaction events missing chat_type.
- Verify groupAllowFrom and requireMention protections still apply to reaction-derived events after remediation.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-863: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup
Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupPrivilege behavior lookup
The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-32924 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Critical
- CVSS
- 9.8 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
2 official scoresWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9VulnCheckCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheckVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 4.0 score
6.9MediumVector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Base CVSS 3.1 score
9.8CriticalVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-m69h-jm2f-2pv8)CVE reference, VulnCheck · vendor-advisory
- VulnCheck Advisory: OpenClaw < 2026.3.12 - Authorization Bypass via Misclassified Reaction Events in FeishuCVE reference, VulnCheck · third-party-advisory
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Incorrect Authorization
Incorrect Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.