LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-32899: OpenClaw < 2026.2.25 - Sender Policy Bypass in Slack Reaction and Pin Event Handlers

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.25 fail to consistently apply sender-policy checks to reaction_* and pin_* non-message events before adding them to system-event context. Attackers can bypass configured DM policies and channel user allowlists to inject unauthorized reaction and pin events from restricted senders.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

OpenClaw versions before 2026.2.25 can accept Slack reaction and pin events from senders who should be blocked by configured policies. This can let a restricted Slack user influence OpenClaw's system-event context, but the cited CVSS impact is limited to low integrity impact.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority access-control issue. Prioritize patching where OpenClaw Slack events affect automation, AI context, ticketing, approvals, or other workflows that rely on trusted sender policy enforcement.

Technical view

This is a CWE-863 authorization bypass in OpenClaw Slack reaction_* and pin_* non-message event handlers. Sender-policy checks were not consistently applied before adding these events to system-event context. The CVSS v4.0 score is 5.3 with low complexity and low privileges required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations running OpenClaw before 2026.2.25 with Slack integration enabled and sender policies, DM restrictions, or channel user allowlists relied on for trust boundaries.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not cite active exploitation, and KEV status is false. A plausible attacker would already have limited Slack-level access and use reaction or pin events to bypass OpenClaw sender controls.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports an authorization check gap, not remote code execution or data theft. Focus review on non-message Slack event paths, policy consistency, regression tests for restricted senders, and whether downstream workflows trust system-event context.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade OpenClaw to 2026.2.25 or later.
  • Review the GitHub advisory and patch commits for deployment-specific guidance.
  • Audit Slack sender policies, DM restrictions, and channel allowlists.
  • Review OpenClaw logs for reaction or pin events from restricted senders.
  • Temporarily limit affected Slack integrations if upgrade cannot be completed quickly.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory deployed OpenClaw versions and identify any release before 2026.2.25.
  • Confirm reaction_* and pin_* handlers enforce sender-policy checks.
  • In staging, verify restricted Slack senders cannot enter system-event context.
  • Review recent system-event context entries for unauthorized reaction or pin sources.
  • Confirm production is running the patched OpenClaw release.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-863: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-32899 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-32899Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
OpenClawOpenClaw0, 2026.2.25unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-863 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Authorization

Incorrect Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.