Security readout for executives and security teams
A flaw in ingress-nginx, a widely used Kubernetes traffic router, lets an attacker who can create or modify Ingress objects inject malicious nginx configuration through the rewrite-target annotation. Successful abuse can run code inside the controller and expose secrets it can reach. In default installs, that means cluster-wide secrets, making this a serious risk for any Kubernetes environment using this component. Kubernetes clusters running ingress-nginx where any tenant, namespace user, or compromised workload can create or update Ingress resources are exposed. Multi-tenant clusters and shared platforms are at highest risk. Affected version range is not specified in the sources; treat all installs as potentially affected until vendor guidance confirms a fixed release. Treat as a near-term priority for any Kubernetes platform using ingress-nginx, particularly multi-tenant or internet-facing clusters. Authenticated, low-complexity attack with high impact and a public PoC lab raises urgency. Direct platform engineering to confirm version exposure, tighten Ingress RBAC, and apply vendor guidance once a patched release is identified. Mitigation focus: Check kubernetes/ingress-nginx advisories for a fixed release and upgrade controllers on all clusters.; Restrict who can create or edit Ingress resources via RBAC, especially in multi-tenant clusters.; Use admission policy (Kyverno, Gatekeeper, ValidatingAdmissionPolicy) to block or sanitize the rewrite-target annotation..
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupContainer behavior lookup
The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-3288 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 8.8 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
8.8HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/137560CVE reference
- https://github.com/bvabhishek/CVE-2026-3288-labCVE reference · exploit
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Input Validation
Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
