CVE-2026-32589: Mirror-registry: quay: insecure direct object reference in blobupload
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's container image upload process. An authenticated user with push access to any repository on the registry can interfere with image uploads in progress by other users, including those in repositories they do not have access to. This could allow the attacker to read, modify, or cancel another user's in-progress image upload.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This flaw lets a logged-in user who can push to any repository interfere with another user’s container image upload, even in repositories they cannot access. The business risk is supply-chain disruption or tampering during image publishing, especially in shared Red Hat Quay or mirror registry environments.
Executive priority
Treat as high priority for shared registries supporting production image pipelines. The issue can undermine image publishing integrity and availability, but the sources do not support internet-wide unauthenticated exploitation or confirmed active exploitation.
Technical view
CVE-2026-32589 is a CWE-639 insecure direct object reference in Red Hat Quay blobupload handling. An authenticated low-privilege pusher can access another in-progress upload object across repository boundaries, potentially reading, modifying, or canceling that upload. CVSS 3.1 score is 7.4 high.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely where affected Red Hat Quay 3.9 through 3.17 or mirror registry for Red Hat OpenShift instances allow multiple users or teams to push images. Single-tenant or tightly controlled registries have lower practical exposure.
Exploitation context
The provided bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. Exploitation requires authentication and push access to some repository, but not to the victim repository. The impact is limited to uploads in progress, not completed images per the sources.
Researcher notes
Focus validation on authorization boundaries in blobupload lifecycle handling. Evidence supports cross-repository interference by authenticated push users. The source bundle does not provide proof-of-concept details, fixed package versions, or runtime indicators beyond vendor advisories and affected package streams.
Mitigation direction
Identify affected Red Hat Quay and mirror registry deployments listed in the Red Hat CVE data.
Review the matching Red Hat RHSA advisory for the deployed product and version.
Apply vendor-provided updates or mitigations only as directed by Red Hat guidance.
Restrict push access to trusted users until remediation is complete.
Monitor registry upload failures, cancellations, and unexpected image changes.
Validation and detection
Inventory Quay and mirror registry package versions against the affected product list.
Confirm whether untrusted or cross-team users have push access to any repository.
Check Red Hat advisory applicability for each deployed version and package stream.
Review audit logs for unusual upload cancellation, overwrite, or cross-repository access patterns.
After remediation, verify deployed package versions match Red Hat guidance.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-639: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-639 · source CWE mapping
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.