LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-32424: WordPress Sprout Clients plugin <= 3.2.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in BoldGrid Sprout Clients sprout-clients allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Sprout Clients: from n/a through <= 3.2.2.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-32424 is a stored cross-site scripting issue in the WordPress Sprout Clients plugin through version 3.2.2. A lower-privileged authenticated user could store malicious script content that runs when another user views the affected page. Business risk is moderate because exploitation needs an account and user interaction, but it can affect administrator sessions or site trust.

Executive priority

Treat as a routine but timely WordPress plugin remediation item. Prioritize internet-facing sites, sites with many content contributors, and sites where WordPress administrator compromise would create business impact. There is no cited evidence of active exploitation.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-79 improper input neutralization during web page generation in BoldGrid Sprout Clients. CVSS 3.1 is 6.5: network exploitable, low complexity, low privileges required, user interaction required, changed scope, and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The public record identifies affected versions as Sprout Clients through 3.2.2.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running the Sprout Clients plugin at version 3.2.2 or earlier. The CVE record’s affected metadata is sparse, so teams should verify installed plugin version directly in WordPress or asset inventory.

Exploitation context

No source in the provided bundle reports active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked in KEV. Stored XSS typically becomes dangerous when malicious content is saved by an authorized user and later viewed by another user, potentially including an administrator.

Researcher notes

Public detail is limited to the CVE description, CVSS vector, affected range, CWE-79 classification, and Patchstack reference. Do not assume a specific sink, payload, or fixed version from the provided bundle. Validation should focus on asset/version confirmation and vendor advisory monitoring.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify WordPress sites using the Sprout Clients plugin.
  • Check whether installed versions are 3.2.2 or earlier.
  • Review vendor and Patchstack guidance for a fixed version or official mitigation.
  • Restrict plugin access to trusted users until remediated.
  • Back up the site before applying plugin updates or configuration changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the plugin name is Sprout Clients, package sprout-clients.
  • Record installed plugin versions from WordPress administration or inventory tools.
  • Compare versions against the affected range: through 3.2.2.
  • Review user roles allowed to create or edit plugin-managed content.
  • Check web application logs for unusual saved content or administrator-page script alerts.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-32424 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.33.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-32424Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
BoldGridSprout Clientssprout-clients, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.