LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-32367: WordPress Modal Dialog plugin <= 3.5.16 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Yannick Lefebvre Modal Dialog modal-dialog allows Remote Code Inclusion.This issue affects Modal Dialog: from n/a through <= 3.5.16.

CriticalCVSS 9.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-32367 is a critical code injection issue in the WordPress Modal Dialog plugin, reported for versions up to 3.5.16. It could let a highly privileged user cause remote code execution. Business urgency is highest for WordPress sites using this plugin, especially where administrator accounts or site management access may be exposed.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for any WordPress property using Modal Dialog. Prioritize inventory and containment first, because no fix is named in the provided sources. The high-privilege requirement means account security and plugin exposure drive business risk.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-94 improper control of code generation in Yannick Lefebvre Modal Dialog, allowing remote code inclusion. CVSS 3.1 is 9.1 with network access, low complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Source data does not name a fixed version.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress installations running Modal Dialog through version 3.5.16. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires high privileges, so risk concentrates around compromised admin accounts, over-permissioned users, or hostile insiders.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The vulnerability is still serious because successful abuse can affect site code execution and full site integrity. High privileges are required, reducing unauthenticated internet-scale exposure.

Researcher notes

There is a data inconsistency: the description states affected through 3.5.16, while the structured affected entry lists version 0 with defaultStatus unaffected. Base analysis on the narrative and Patchstack reference, but verify against vendor records before broad conclusions.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify WordPress sites using the Modal Dialog plugin.
  • Check vendor, WordPress plugin, and Patchstack guidance for a fixed version or advisory.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if it is not business-critical.
  • Restrict and review high-privilege WordPress accounts.
  • Ensure recent backups exist before remediation changes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory installed Modal Dialog plugin versions across WordPress sites.
  • Flag installations at or below version 3.5.16 for review.
  • Confirm whether any vendor-provided update is available.
  • Review recent high-privilege account activity for unexpected changes.
  • Monitor web and WordPress logs for suspicious administrative actions.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-94: Code execution behavior lookup

Code execution and unsafe deserialization weaknesses often justify reviewing execution behavior and process telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-32367 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H2.36Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.1Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-32367Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Yannick LefebvreModal Dialogmodal-dialog, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-94 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.