LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-32330: WordPress Photo Gallery by 10Web plugin <= 1.8.37 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 10Web Photo Gallery by 10Web photo-gallery allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Photo Gallery by 10Web: from n/a through <= 1.8.37.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a medium-severity CSRF issue in the WordPress Photo Gallery by 10Web plugin through version 1.8.37. An attacker may be able to trick a logged-in user into causing an unintended plugin action. The published scoring indicates limited integrity impact, with no direct confidentiality or availability impact identified.

Executive priority

Prioritize identification and remediation on WordPress sites where this plugin is active, especially administrator-managed sites. This is not currently supported as an actively exploited or critical issue in the provided sources, but it can still enable unauthorized changes if users are tricked.

Technical view

CVE-2026-32330 is CWE-352 affecting Photo Gallery by 10Web, package photo-gallery, through <= 1.8.37. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N. The issue is request forgery requiring user interaction, with impact limited to integrity according to the CVE data.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites running Photo Gallery by 10Web version 1.8.37 or earlier. Sites not using this plugin, or using versions outside the affected range, are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction, consistent with CSRF, and would typically depend on a victim being authenticated to the affected WordPress site.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE record and Patchstack database entry. The provided data does not name a fixed version, specific affected actions, proof of concept, or exploitation in the wild. Treat version <= 1.8.37 as the actionable affected range unless vendor guidance refines it.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Photo Gallery by 10Web, slug photo-gallery.
  • Upgrade if vendor or Patchstack identifies a fixed release.
  • If no fix is available, disable or remove the plugin where feasible.
  • Warn administrators against clicking untrusted links while authenticated.
  • Monitor the CVE and Patchstack advisory for remediation updates.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed plugin versions and flag <= 1.8.37.
  • Check whether the plugin is active on production WordPress sites.
  • Review vendor and Patchstack pages for fixed-version information.
  • Review admin logs for unexpected gallery or plugin configuration changes.
  • For internal review, verify state-changing plugin actions enforce CSRF protection.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-32330 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-32330Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
10WebPhoto Gallery by 10Webphoto-gallery, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.