LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-32058: OpenClaw < 2026.2.26 - Approval Context-Binding Weakness in system.run via host=node

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.26 contain an approval context-binding weakness in system.run execution flows with host=node that allows reuse of previously approved requests with modified environment variables. Attackers with access to an approval id can exploit this by reusing an approval with changed env input, bypassing execution-integrity controls in approval-enabled workflows.

LowCVSS 2.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a low-severity approval bypass in OpenClaw before 2026.2.26. In specific approval-enabled workflows, someone who already has an approval id could reuse it while changing environment input. The likely business impact is limited integrity risk in automated execution workflows, not data theft or service outage based on the provided CVSS vector.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted workflow-integrity issue, not an emergency internet-wide exposure. Prioritize upgrade during the next normal security maintenance window, sooner if OpenClaw controls sensitive automation or privileged operational tasks.

Technical view

CVE-2026-32058 is a CWE-863 authorization weakness in OpenClaw system.run flows using host=node. Approved execution context was not sufficiently bound to environment variables, allowing modified env input with a reused approval id. The CVSS 3.1 score is 2.6, with low integrity impact, high attack complexity, required privileges, and user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to OpenClaw deployments before 2026.2.26 that use approval-enabled system.run workflows with host=node. Risk increases where approval ids are visible to lower-privileged users, logs, integrations, or shared workflow state.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not indicate active exploitation, and KEV is false. Exploitation requires access to an approval id, prior approval context, privileges, and user interaction. The described impact is bypassing execution-integrity controls through modified environment variables, not direct code execution from an unauthenticated position.

Researcher notes

The available evidence identifies affected versions, class, vector, and patch reference, but not detailed exploit telemetry. Focus review on approval context binding, env input integrity, approval id handling, and regression coverage around host=node execution flows.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade OpenClaw to 2026.2.26 or later.
  • Review the GitHub advisory and patch commit for vendor-specific remediation details.
  • Restrict access to approval ids in logs, workflow output, and integrations.
  • Review approval-enabled system.run workflows that use host=node.
  • Reissue or invalidate outstanding approvals after applying the vendor fix.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OpenClaw versions and flag instances older than 2026.2.26.
  • Identify workflows using system.run with host=node and approval enforcement.
  • Check whether approval ids are exposed in logs, tickets, chat, or CI output.
  • Confirm upgraded deployments include the vendor patch behavior.
  • Review recent workflow history for unexpected environment input changes.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-863: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-32058 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
2.6 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
2.6CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N1.21.4VulnCheck
2CVSS 4.0LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

2Low
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-32058Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
OpenClawOpenClaw0, 2026.2.26unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-863 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Authorization

Incorrect Authorization represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.