LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-32049: OpenClaw < 2026.2.22 - Denial of Service via Inbound Media Download Byte Limit Bypass

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 fail to consistently enforce configured inbound media byte limits before buffering remote media across multiple channel ingestion paths. Remote attackers can send oversized media payloads to trigger elevated memory usage and potential process instability.

HighCVSS 8.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

OpenClaw before 2026.2.22 can mishandle oversized inbound media and consume excessive memory. A remote unauthenticated attacker could cause service instability or denial of service. The issue affects availability, not confidentiality or data integrity, based on the provided CVSS vector.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority availability risk for exposed OpenClaw services. Patch promptly where inbound media ingestion is enabled, especially for public or partner-facing systems.

Technical view

The flaw is a CWE-770 resource allocation issue. OpenClaw does not consistently enforce configured inbound media byte limits before buffering remote media across multiple channel ingestion paths. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates network access, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high vulnerable-system availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where OpenClaw accepts inbound media from remote or untrusted channels and runs a version earlier than 2026.2.22.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. It supports remote unauthenticated denial-of-service potential through oversized media handling, but does not provide exploit prevalence or observed attacks.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the supplied CVE, GitHub advisory, patch reference, and VulnCheck advisory. The bundle names multiple ingestion paths but does not provide detailed route names or active exploitation evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade OpenClaw to 2026.2.22 or later.
  • Review the GitHub advisory for vendor-specific remediation guidance.
  • Apply the referenced patch only through a vendor-supported process.
  • Prioritize systems that ingest remote media from untrusted channels.
  • Monitor OpenClaw processes for abnormal memory growth or instability.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory deployed OpenClaw versions and identify any below 2026.2.22.
  • Confirm which deployments ingest inbound media from remote channels.
  • Verify the fixed version or patch is present after remediation.
  • Review logs for crashes, restarts, or memory pressure around media ingestion.
  • Avoid production validation using oversized media payloads.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-770: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-32049 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-32049Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
OpenClawOpenClaw0, 2026.2.22unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-770 · source CWE mapping

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.