LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-30792: RustDesk Client Blindly Merges Unauthenticated Strategy Payloads, Bypassing Local Security Settings

A vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android, WebClient (Strategy sync, HTTP API client, config options engine modules) allows Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle. This vulnerability is associated with program files src/hbbs_http/sync.Rs, hbb_common/src/config.Rs and program routines Strategy merge loop in sync.Rs, Config::set_options(). This issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.8.

HighCVSS 8.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

RustDesk Client can accept unauthenticated strategy configuration data during sync. A network attacker able to intercept traffic could change client security settings, undermining local protections. The CVE affects RustDesk Client through 1.4.8 across listed desktop, mobile, and WebClient platforms.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority remote access tooling issue. The main business risk is unauthorized weakening of client security controls, especially in managed RustDesk environments or on untrusted networks.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-345 in strategy sync, HTTP API client, and config option handling. The CVE identifies src/hbbs_http/sync.Rs, hbb_common/src/config.Rs, the strategy merge loop, and Config::set_options() as involved. CVSS 4.0 is 8.3 high with network attack vector and no required privileges or user interaction.

Likely exposure

Organizations are exposed where RustDesk Client through 1.4.8 is deployed and uses strategy sync or centrally supplied configuration across networks vulnerable to man-in-the-middle positioning.

Exploitation context

The source bundle includes a third-party advisory tagged as exploit, but it does not state confirmed in-the-wild exploitation. CISA KEV status is false in the supplied data.

Researcher notes

Evidence identifies unauthenticated strategy payload merging into configuration options, but the supplied bundle does not include full patch details or confirmed active exploitation. Validate exposure by mapping affected versions and strategy-sync use, not by assuming all RustDesk server deployments are affected.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory RustDesk Client deployments and identify versions through 1.4.8.
  • Check RustDesk vendor guidance for fixed releases or configuration mitigations.
  • Prioritize remediation for clients using strategy sync or managed configuration.
  • Avoid relying on local client security settings as the only control until remediated.
  • Monitor vendor and CVE records for updated remediation details.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed RustDesk Client versions on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and WebClient.
  • Determine whether strategy sync or centrally managed client configuration is enabled.
  • Review network paths for plausible man-in-the-middle exposure to configuration endpoints.
  • Check whether vendor guidance has been applied on each managed client group.
  • Document compensating controls where upgrades or mitigations are unavailable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-345: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-30792 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.3CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VULSec

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.3High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-30792Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
rustdesk-clientRustDesk Clientrustdesk-client, 0affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-345 · source CWE mapping

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.