LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-3055: Insufficient input validation leading to memory overread

Insufficient input validation in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as a SAML IDP leading to memory overread

CriticalCVSS 9.3Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-3055 affects NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway only when configured as a SAML Identity Provider. Citrix describes insufficient input validation causing memory overread. The CVSS 4.0 score is 9.3, so internet-facing identity infrastructure should be treated as high-priority even without confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for organizations using NetScaler as SAML IDP. These appliances often sit on the identity perimeter, and the CVSS score is critical. Immediate inventory and vendor-guided remediation planning are warranted.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-125 memory overread in NetScaler ADC/Gateway SAML IDP handling. Listed affected trains are ADC 14.1, 13.1, 13.1 FIPS and NDcPP, and Gateway 14.1 and 13.1. CVSS indicates network attackability, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where NetScaler ADC or Gateway is deployed as a SAML Identity Provider, especially if reachable from untrusted networks. Deployments not using the SAML IDP configuration are not indicated as affected by the provided description.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not establish active exploitation. CISA KEV is marked false in the provided data. A third-party WatchTowr advisory is referenced, but the bundle does not provide enough detail to state exploit availability or real-world use.

Researcher notes

Evidence confirms a memory overread class issue and affected product lines, but provided sources do not include root-cause detail, indicators, exploit reliability, or fixed versions. Avoid assuming impact beyond SAML IDP configurations until Citrix or trusted research provides more detail.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify NetScaler ADC and Gateway systems configured as SAML IDP.
  • Prioritize affected 14.1 and 13.1 deployments for vendor-directed remediation.
  • Review Citrix advisory CTX696300 for fixed versions or configuration guidance.
  • Reduce unnecessary external exposure where business operations allow.
  • Monitor vendor and CISA updates for exploitation or remediation changes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory NetScaler ADC and Gateway versions across production and perimeter environments.
  • Confirm whether each appliance is configured as a SAML Identity Provider.
  • Compare versions against Citrix advisory CTX696300 affected and fixed version guidance.
  • Check CISA KEV status for any change in known exploitation.
  • Review security monitoring for unusual authentication or appliance behavior.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-125: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-3055 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA / ADP
Date added
Not provided

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:LPrimary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-3055Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
NetScalerADC14.1, 13.1, 13.1 FIPS and NDcPPunaffected
NetScalerGateway14.1, 13.1unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-125 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Read

Out-of-bounds Read represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.