CVE-2026-3012: Samba: group policy certificate enrollment uses http:// without validation
A flaw was found in Samba’s certificate auto-enrollment Group Policy handling. When certificate auto-enrollment is enabled, Samba may retrieve a CA certificate over an unencrypted HTTP connection and install it into the local trust store without proper verification. An attacker with the ability to intercept or redirect network traffic could exploit this behavior to supply a malicious certificate authority certificate, potentially allowing interception or spoofing of trusted communications.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Samba may trust a certificate authority certificate fetched over plain HTTP during Group Policy certificate auto-enrollment. If an attacker can intercept or redirect that network path, they could plant a malicious CA and make later trusted communications easier to spoof or intercept.
Executive priority
Treat as high priority for domain-joined Linux and OpenShift environments using Samba Group Policy certificate enrollment. It is not described as internet-wormable or actively exploited, but it can undermine certificate trust and enable serious follow-on interception or spoofing.
Technical view
CVE-2026-3012 is a CWE-345 validation flaw in Samba certificate auto-enrollment Group Policy handling. The reported path retrieves a CA certificate over unencrypted HTTP and installs it into the local trust store without adequate verification. Red Hat rates it high, CVSS 8.0, with changed scope and high confidentiality and integrity impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears concentrated in Red Hat systems running affected samba or rhcos packages where certificate auto-enrollment Group Policy is enabled. Listed affected streams include RHEL 7, 8, 9, 10, related EUS/AUS/TUS/SAP variants, and OpenShift Container Platform 4.19. RHEL 6 samba status is listed as unknown.
Exploitation context
The bundle does not show KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Exploitation requires the ability to intercept or redirect relevant network traffic and depends on certificate auto-enrollment being enabled, but successful abuse could compromise trust decisions broadly on the host.
Researcher notes
Key conditions are auto-enrollment GPO use and attacker network-position capability. The sources do not provide exploit details here, and none should be assumed. Focus research on trust-store modification paths, HTTP retrieval behavior, package lineage, and Red Hat errata mapping.
Mitigation direction
Apply the relevant Red Hat RHSA updates for each affected product stream.
Check Red Hat guidance for fixed package versions and operational workarounds.
Review whether Samba certificate auto-enrollment Group Policy is enabled.
Limit exposure to traffic interception or redirection on management networks.
Audit local trust stores for unexpected CA certificates.
Validation and detection
Inventory RHEL and OpenShift versions against the affected product list.
Check installed samba or rhcos package versions against Red Hat advisories.
Confirm whether certificate auto-enrollment Group Policy is configured.
Review recent trust store changes for unapproved CA additions.
Track RHEL 6 status separately because the bundle marks it unknown.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-345: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
7Timeline events
2ADP providers
15Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-345 · source CWE mapping
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.