Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
eAI Technologies ERP F2 can load a malicious library placed beside its program files. An attacker must already have authenticated local access, but successful abuse could let them run code and compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the ERP workstation or server.
Executive priority
Prioritize identification and containment on ERP systems with multiple local users or permissive installation directories. Treat it as a high-severity local compromise path, not an unauthenticated internet emergency. Escalate patching once the vendor-supported fixed version or remediation is confirmed.
Technical view
CVE-2026-2998 is a CWE-426 DLL search-path hijacking vulnerability. A low-privileged, authenticated local attacker can place a crafted DLL in the program directory; ERP may load it and execute arbitrary code without user interaction. The CVSS 4.0 score is 8.5 (high).
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to systems running the affected eAI Technologies ERP F2 release and allowing a local user to write beside the executable. The supplied affected-version value is “0,” whose practical meaning is unclear; confirm exact version scope with the vendor advisories and asset inventory.
Exploitation context
The vulnerability requires authenticated local access and low privileges; it is not described as remotely exploitable. The supplied record says it is not in CISA KEV, and no provided source establishes active exploitation. Local footholds, shared systems, or weak program-directory permissions increase practical risk.
Researcher notes
The critical precondition is whether a low-privileged authenticated user can write a crafted DLL into the ERP program directory. The supplied sources do not clarify DLL names, load order, affected components, fixed versions, or observed exploitation. Avoid assuming version “0” represents every ERP F2 release.
Mitigation direction
- Check eAI Technologies or cited advisory guidance for an official fixed release or remediation.
- Restrict write access to ERP installation directories to authorized administrators only.
- Remove unnecessary local accounts and review privileges on systems running ERP F2.
- Monitor ERP directories for unexpected or newly modified DLL files.
- Use application control to prevent unapproved libraries where operationally appropriate.
Validation and detection
- Inventory all ERP F2 installations and record their exact versions and installation paths.
- Confirm affected-version interpretation against the CVE record and cited advisories.
- Review installation-directory permissions for non-administrator write access.
- Check file-integrity and endpoint telemetry for unexpected DLL creation or loading.
- After remediation, verify permissions and confirm the vendor-supported ERP version is installed.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-426: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2026-2998 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 8.5 (4.0)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
2 official scoresWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——twcertCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9twcertVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 4.0 score
8.5HighVector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Base CVSS 3.1 score
7.8HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://www.twcert.org.tw/tw/cp-132-10722-db7cb-1.htmlCVE reference, twcert · third-party-advisory
- https://www.twcert.org.tw/en/cp-139-10723-14549-2.htmlCVE reference, twcert · third-party-advisory
- https://www.chtsecurity.com/news/3ba23045-da8a-4925-b476-967234a0abbaCVE reference, twcert · third-party-advisory
- https://www.chtsecurity.com/news/95b1c87c-7649-4f9d-bbd6-b69c16b59ceaCVE reference, twcert · third-party-advisory
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Untrusted Search Path
Untrusted Search Path represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.