LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-29186: @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node: TechDocs Mkdocs Configuration Key Enables Arbitrary Code Execution

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Prior to version 1.14.3, this is a configuration bypass vulnerability that enables arbitrary code execution. The @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node package uses an allowlist to filter dangerous MkDocs configuration keys during the documentation build process. A gap in this allowlist allows attackers to craft an mkdocs.yml that causes arbitrary Python code execution, completely bypassing TechDocs' security controls. This issue has been patched in version 1.14.3.

CriticalCVSS 9.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability lets a low-privileged attacker make Backstage TechDocs run arbitrary Python code during documentation generation. The business risk is serious where developer portals build documentation from user- or repository-controlled mkdocs.yml files, because the build system may have access to internal services, tokens, or source metadata.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent for any Backstage portal that builds TechDocs from contributor-controlled repositories. The vulnerability can convert documentation publishing into code execution inside internal build infrastructure, which may expose sensitive developer systems even without public internet exploitation evidence.

Technical view

@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node before 1.14.3 filters dangerous MkDocs configuration keys with an allowlist. The advisory says a gap in that allowlist permits crafted mkdocs.yml content to bypass TechDocs controls and execute arbitrary Python code during the build process. CVSS 9.1 indicates network reachability, low attack complexity, low privileges, and changed scope.

Likely exposure

Backstage environments using TechDocs builds with @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node versions before 1.14.3 are the stated exposure. Risk is highest where contributors can influence mkdocs.yml through repositories, pull requests, templates, or documentation pipelines processed by the portal.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation requires getting a crafted MkDocs configuration processed by TechDocs, so exposure depends on repository permissions, documentation build triggers, and the privileges of the build runtime.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on TechDocs build boundaries, mkdocs.yml trust assumptions, and the effective privileges of the documentation builder. The provided sources identify the affected package and fixed version, but do not provide complete product deployment matrices beyond Backstage versions before 1.14.3.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node or Backstage to version 1.14.3 or later.
  • Check GitHub and Red Hat advisories for environment-specific guidance.
  • Inventory TechDocs build pipelines that process repository-controlled mkdocs.yml files.
  • Limit or pause untrusted TechDocs builds until patched, if upgrade is delayed.
  • Review build runtime secrets and permissions for unnecessary access.

Validation and detection

  • Check deployed Backstage and @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node versions against 1.14.3.
  • Confirm runtime images and lockfiles contain the patched package version.
  • Identify who can submit or modify mkdocs.yml processed by TechDocs.
  • Review recent TechDocs build logs for unexpected Python execution indicators.
  • Verify documentation builds still succeed after upgrading.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-434: File access and web shell behavior lookup

File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-74: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-791: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-29186 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
7Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L3.15.3redhat-SADP
7.7CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L1.85.3GitHub_M

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.1Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-29186Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPbackstage/plugin-techdocs-node: TechDocs Mkdocs configuration key enables arbitrary code execution
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-03-07T16:01:40.949Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-03-07T15:03:51.422Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
backstagebackstage< 1.14.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-434 · source CWE mapping

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type

Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-74 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-791 · source CWE mapping

Incomplete Filtering of Special Elements

Incomplete Filtering of Special Elements represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.