LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-29023: Keygraph Shannon Hard-coded Router API Key

Keygraph Shannon contains a hard-coded API key in its router configuration that, when the router component is enabled and exposed, allows network attackers to authenticate using the publicly known static key. An attacker able to reach the router port can proxy requests through the Shannon instance using the victim’s configured upstream provider API credentials, resulting in unauthorized API usage and potential disclosure of proxied request and response data. This vulnerability's general exploitability has been mitigated with the introduction of commit 023cc95.

HighCVSS 7.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Keygraph Shannon includes a hard-coded router API key. If the router is enabled and reachable, an unauthenticated network attacker could authenticate with the static key, route requests through the victim instance, consume upstream API credits, and potentially expose proxied request or response data.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for any internet-exposed or partner-accessible Shannon deployment. The business risk is unauthorized API consumption, unexpected provider costs, and potential disclosure of proxied data. Prioritize exposure discovery before broad emergency action.

Technical view

This is CWE-798: use of hard-coded credentials in Shannon router configuration. CVSS is 7.3 high: network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction. Sources say general exploitability was mitigated by commit 023cc95, but affected release and upgrade guidance are not fully specified.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Shannon’s router component is enabled and its router port is reachable from the internet or untrusted networks. Systems without the router enabled, or with strict network access controls, appear less exposed based on the source description.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The issue is still serious because a reachable router could allow unauthorized authenticated proxying using a static credential and the victim’s configured upstream provider credentials.

Researcher notes

The source bundle names KeygraphHQ Shannon with version data listed only as “0” and default status unknown, so affected-version precision is limited. The strongest technical anchors are the hard-coded credential description, CVSS vector, GitHub issue/PR, and mitigation commit reference.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply vendor guidance or a Shannon build containing commit 023cc95.
  • Disable the router component if it is not required.
  • Restrict router access to trusted networks only.
  • Rotate upstream provider API credentials if exposure is suspected.
  • Review API provider usage for unexpected traffic or charges.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Shannon deployments and identify enabled router components.
  • Confirm whether any router port is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Check whether the deployed build includes commit 023cc95 or later remediation.
  • Review logs for unexpected router authentication or proxied requests.
  • Compare upstream API usage against expected Shannon workloads.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-798: Credential and account abuse lookup

Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-29023 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.3CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L3.93.4VulnCheck
6.9CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.9Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-29023Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
KeygraphHQShannon0unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-798 · source CWE mapping

Use of Hard-coded Credentials

Use of Hard-coded Credentials represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.