LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-28562: wpForo Forum 2.4.14 SQL Injection via Topics ORDER BY Parameter

wpForo 2.4.14 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in Topics::get_topics() where the ORDER BY clause relies on ineffective esc_sql() sanitization on unquoted identifiers. Attackers exploit the wpfob parameter with CASE WHEN payloads to perform blind boolean extraction of credentials from the WordPress database.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A WordPress forum plugin flaw can let an unauthenticated attacker query database information through vulnerable topic sorting behavior. The main business risk is exposure of WordPress user credential data or other sensitive database records on sites running affected wpForo Forum versions.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for internet-facing WordPress sites because exploitation requires no login and may expose credential data. This is high urgency for sites with active forums, customer accounts, or privileged WordPress users.

Technical view

CVE-2026-28562 is a CWE-89 SQL injection in wpForo Forum Topics::get_topics(). The source bundle attributes the issue to unsafe ORDER BY handling where esc_sql() is ineffective for unquoted identifiers. CVSS v4.0 is 8.8, with network access, no privileges, and no user interaction required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely for public WordPress sites running wpForo Forum versions identified in the bundle, especially 2.4.14. The bundle also lists 2.4 and 2.4.15 as affected, so confirm exact installed versions against vendor and CVE records.

Exploitation context

The bundle describes blind boolean SQL injection and potential credential extraction from the WordPress database. It does not cite CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation in the wild, so treat exploitation as plausible but not confirmed from these sources.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strong for vulnerability class, affected component, and severity from the provided CVE and VulnCheck references. Evidence is incomplete on observed exploitation and the exact fixed version, so do not assert active exploitation or a specific patch level without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites using wpForo Forum and record exact plugin versions.
  • Check the WordPress.org developer changelog and vendor guidance for the fixed release.
  • Update affected wpForo Forum installations according to vendor guidance.
  • Restrict unnecessary public access to forum functionality where business requirements allow.
  • Review database and WordPress account activity for suspicious access patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether wpForo Forum is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Compare installed versions with the CVE record, VulnCheck advisory, and vendor changelog.
  • Check web server and application logs for unusual topic sorting requests.
  • Verify the plugin update completed successfully in WordPress administration.
  • Review WordPress users for unexpected administrator accounts or password reset activity.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-28562 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck
8.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N3.94.2VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.8High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-28562Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
gVectors TeamwpForo Forum2.4, 2.4.15unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.