LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-28470: OpenClaw < 2026.2.2 - Exec Allowlist Bypass via Command Substitution in Double Quotes

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.2 contain an exec approvals (must be enabled) allowlist bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by injecting command substitution syntax. Attackers can bypass the allowlist protection by embedding unescaped $() or backticks inside double-quoted strings to execute unauthorized commands.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

OpenClaw before 2026.2.2 can fail to enforce its exec approval allowlist when that feature is enabled. An unauthenticated attacker may run commands that should have been blocked, potentially leading to full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for any production OpenClaw deployment using exec approvals. The issue can undermine a security control intended to restrict command execution, and the published severity indicates potential full system impact if exploited.

Technical view

CVE-2026-28470 is a CWE-78 command injection issue in OpenClaw exec approvals. The advisory describes an allowlist bypass using shell command substitution inside double-quoted strings, allowing unauthorized command execution despite approvals. CVSS 3.1 is 9.8, network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant to OpenClaw deployments running versions earlier than 2026.2.2 with exec approvals enabled. Systems not using OpenClaw, or not using the exec approvals feature, are less likely to be affected based on the provided description.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not state active exploitation, and this CVE is not marked as CISA KEV in the bundle. However, the vulnerability is remotely exploitable with no privileges or user interaction according to the CVSS vector, making prompt remediation appropriate.

Researcher notes

Evidence is consistent across the CVE description, GitHub advisory reference, patch commit, and VulnCheck advisory. The affected-version metadata in the bundle is sparse, but the title and description clearly identify versions prior to 2026.2.2. No source provided confirms exploitation in the wild.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade OpenClaw to version 2026.2.2 or later, per the advisory title and patch reference.
  • Review the GitHub advisory and patch commit for vendor-specific upgrade details.
  • If immediate upgrade is not possible, review vendor guidance for safe temporary controls.
  • Restrict network access to OpenClaw interfaces until remediation is complete where operationally feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OpenClaw deployments and record installed versions.
  • Confirm whether exec approvals are enabled in each deployment.
  • Verify upgraded instances report OpenClaw 2026.2.2 or later.
  • Review logs for unusual or unauthorized command execution activity.
  • Track the GitHub advisory for any updated detection or mitigation guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-28470 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-28470Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
OpenClawOpenClaw0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.