LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-28423: Statamic Vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery via Glide

Statmatic is a Laravel and Git powered content management system (CMS). Prior to versions 5.73.11 and 6.4.0, when Glide image manipulation is used in insecure mode (which is not the default), the image proxy can be abused by an unauthenticated user to make the server send HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs—either via the URL directly or via the watermark feature. That can allow access to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and other hosts reachable from the server. This has been fixed in 5.73.11 and 6.4.0.

MediumCVSS 6.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Statamic CMS sites using Glide image manipulation in insecure mode can be tricked into making server-side web requests. This matters because the server may reach internal systems or cloud metadata services that are not exposed to the internet. The insecure mode is not the default, reducing likely exposure.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted configuration-dependent issue. Prioritize public Statamic sites, especially those hosted in cloud environments or networks with sensitive internal services. Upgrade during the next security maintenance window, sooner if insecure Glide mode is confirmed.

Technical view

CVE-2026-28423 is an unauthenticated SSRF in Statamic CMS before 5.73.11 and in 6.x before 6.4.0. When Glide is configured in insecure mode, the image proxy can request arbitrary URLs directly or through the watermark feature. Impact is primarily confidentiality, with high attack complexity and changed scope per CVSS 3.1 score 6.8.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Statamic CMS installations running affected versions with Glide image manipulation enabled in insecure mode. Default configurations are reportedly not affected. Internet-facing CMS deployments have higher concern if their servers can reach internal networks or cloud metadata endpoints.

Exploitation context

The sources do not report active exploitation, and this CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle. Exploitation requires a specific insecure Glide configuration, but no authentication or user interaction is required once that condition exists.

Researcher notes

The advisory identifies SSRF through Glide’s image proxy and watermark handling only when insecure mode is used. The provided sources do not include proof-of-concept details or evidence of exploitation. Validation should focus on version, Glide configuration, and reachable internal assets rather than broad Statamic exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Statamic 5.x to 5.73.11 or later.
  • Upgrade Statamic 6.x to 6.4.0 or later.
  • Review Glide configuration and avoid insecure mode unless vendor guidance explicitly supports it.
  • Restrict server egress to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints where feasible.
  • Monitor vendor advisory updates for additional guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Statamic CMS instances and record installed versions.
  • Check whether Glide image manipulation is enabled.
  • Confirm whether Glide is configured in insecure mode.
  • Verify affected instances have been upgraded to fixed versions.
  • Review web and application logs for unusual image proxy URL usage.
  • Assess server network reachability to sensitive internal services.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-28423 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.8CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N2.24Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.8Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-28423Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
statamiccms< 5.73.11, >= 6.0.0, < 6.4.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.