LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-28302: SolarWinds Serv-U Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) Vulnerability

SolarWinds Serv-U is affected by an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability that can lead to privilege escalation and remote code execution as root. This issue requires group administrator access. The impact is lower in Windows deployments.

CriticalCVSS 9.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A Serv-U group administrator may access an object without proper authorization, potentially escalating privileges and executing code with root authority. Serv-U 15.5.4 HF1 and earlier are affected. The reported impact is lower on Windows, but affected deployments still warrant urgent review.

Executive priority

Treat affected, reachable deployments as an urgent remediation priority, especially on non-Windows systems. Root-level code execution could enable complete server compromise and disruption. Because exploitation requires group administrator access, prioritize systems with exposed administration, weak credential controls, or suspicious administrator activity.

Technical view

CWE-639 IDOR permits a high-privilege, network-based attacker with group administrator access to cross an authorization boundary. The CVSS 3.1 assessment is 9.1: low complexity, no user interaction, changed scope, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Successful exploitation can produce root-level remote code execution.

Likely exposure

Exposure requires Serv-U 15.5.4 HF1 or earlier and an attacker-controlled or compromised group administrator account. Network reachability to the relevant management functionality increases practical risk. The supplied evidence does not identify affected configurations beyond product version or quantify internet exposure.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability is not identified as a CISA KEV entry in the supplied bundle, and no cited evidence establishes active exploitation. Exploitation nevertheless requires only group administrator privileges after network access; compromised administrative credentials could therefore turn an existing foothold into full system compromise.

Researcher notes

The supplied record establishes the affected boundary, prerequisite privilege, CWE-639 classification, and potential root RCE. It does not describe the vulnerable object, request flow, platform-specific mechanics, indicators of compromise, or confirmed exploitation. Validation should remain non-invasive and focus on versions, access controls, accounts, and logs.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Serv-U deployments and identify systems running 15.5.4 HF1 or earlier.
  • Follow SolarWinds guidance and upgrade to a vendor-confirmed unaffected release.
  • Restrict Serv-U administrative interfaces to trusted networks and authorized administrators.
  • Review group administrator accounts and remove unnecessary or stale privileges.
  • Prioritize non-Windows deployments because the reported impact is greater there.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the installed Serv-U version and operating system on every deployment.
  • Verify upgraded systems are outside the vendor-defined affected version range.
  • Audit group administrator membership for unexpected, shared, or dormant accounts.
  • Review authentication and administrative activity logs for anomalous group administrator behavior.
  • Confirm management access is limited by network controls and strong authentication.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-639: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Privilege behavior lookup

The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-28302 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.1CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H2.36SolarWinds
4.7CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L1.23.4SolarWinds

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.1Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-28302Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SolarWindsServ-U15.5.4 HF1 and belowunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-639 · source CWE mapping

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.