LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-28288: Dify has a user enumeration issue

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.9.0, responses from the Dify API to existing and non-existent accounts differ, allowing an attacker to enumerate email addresses registered with Dify. Version 1.9.0 fixes the issue.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Dify versions before 1.9.0 can reveal whether an email address is registered through differing API responses. This does not directly compromise accounts, but it can support phishing, credential attacks, and privacy exposure. Organizations running public or partner-facing Dify instances should prioritize upgrading.

Executive priority

Treat as a near-term privacy and abuse-prevention fix, not an emergency breach indicator. Upgrade affected Dify instances during the next available maintenance window, sooner for public-facing or high-profile environments.

Technical view

CVE-2026-28288 is a CWE-204 observable response discrepancy in langgenius Dify before 1.9.0. Unauthenticated network access can compare API behavior for existing versus non-existent accounts, enabling email enumeration. CVSS v4.0 is 5.5, medium severity, with low attack complexity and limited confidentiality impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant for internet-accessible Dify deployments, shared enterprise instances, or environments where registered user email addresses are sensitive. Self-hosted Dify versions earlier than 1.9.0 are affected according to the advisory data.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked as KEV. The issue is easy to attempt remotely because it requires no privileges or user interaction, but the documented impact is limited to account/email enumeration.

Researcher notes

Sources identify response differences between existing and non-existent accounts, but do not provide broader exploitation evidence. Validate only through safe version checks and vendor advisory review; avoid probing production accounts in ways that could expose personal data.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Dify to version 1.9.0 or later.
  • Review the GitHub advisory for any updated vendor guidance.
  • Reduce public exposure of Dify APIs where business requirements allow.
  • Monitor authentication and account-related endpoints for unusual enumeration patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Dify deployments and confirm running versions.
  • Flag any Dify instance below 1.9.0 as affected.
  • Confirm upgrade completion to 1.9.0 or later.
  • Review logs for repeated account-checking behavior from common sources.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-204: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-28288 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-28288Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
langgeniusdify< 1.9.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-204 · source CWE mapping

Observable Response Discrepancy

Observable Response Discrepancy represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.