LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-27950: FreeRDP heap-use-after-free in update_pointer_new(SDL): Fix Applied in the Wrong File

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to version 3.23.0, the fix for the heap-use-after-free described in CVE-2026-24680 is incomplete. While the vulnerable execution flow referenced in the advisory exists in the SDL2 implementation, the fix appears to have been applied only to the SDL3 code path. In the SDL2 implementation, the pointer is not nulled after free. This creates a situation where the advisory suggests the vulnerability is fully resolved, while builds or environments still using SDL2 may retain the vulnerable logic. A complete fix is available in version 3.23.0.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

FreeRDP had an incomplete fix for a prior memory-safety flaw. Organizations using FreeRDP before 3.23.0, especially builds using the SDL2 client path, may still have vulnerable logic despite earlier guidance suggesting the issue was resolved. Impact is rated medium because the cited CVSS score indicates limited availability impact, not confidentiality or integrity impact.

Executive priority

Treat this as a near-term patching item for environments relying on FreeRDP. It is not presented as actively exploited, but incomplete prior remediation can create false assurance and leave affected systems exposed.

Technical view

CVE-2026-27950 is a CWE-416 heap-use-after-free in FreeRDP before 3.23.0. The earlier CVE-2026-24680 fix was applied to the SDL3 path, while the SDL2 implementation did not null the pointer after free. The published fix is in FreeRDP 3.23.0.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where FreeRDP versions below 3.23.0 are deployed and the SDL2 client implementation is present or used. Downstream distribution packages may vary if they backported the complete fix.

Exploitation context

The CVE record is not listed as KEV in the provided data. The CVSS v4 score is 5.5 with network attack vector and low complexity, but the sources do not state active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Focus review on SDL2 versus SDL3 pointer handling and whether downstream packages incorporated the complete fix. Evidence is limited to the CVE record, GitHub advisory, commits, and referenced source file; no additional exploitation details are provided.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade FreeRDP to version 3.23.0 or later.
  • Check distribution vendor advisories for backported fixes.
  • Prioritize systems using the SDL2 client implementation.
  • Retire or isolate unsupported FreeRDP builds.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory FreeRDP package and embedded library versions.
  • Confirm deployed versions are 3.23.0 or include the complete backport.
  • Identify whether SDL2 client code is built or used.
  • Review vendor changelogs against the referenced FreeRDP commits.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-416: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-27950 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-27950Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FreeRDPFreeRDP< 3.23.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-416 · source CWE mapping

Use After Free

Use After Free represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.