CVE-2026-27893: vLLM's hardcoded trust_remote_code=True in NemotronVL and KimiK25 bypasses user security opt-out
vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Starting in version 0.10.1 and prior to version 0.18.0, two model implementation files hardcode `trust_remote_code=True` when loading sub-components, bypassing the user's explicit `--trust-remote-code=False` security opt-out. This enables remote code execution via malicious model repositories even when the user has explicitly disabled remote code trust. Version 0.18.0 patches the issue.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
vLLM versions 0.10.1 through before 0.18.0 can run code from a malicious model repository even when an operator explicitly disabled remote-code trust. This turns a safety setting into a false assurance for affected model-loading paths.
Executive priority
Treat as high priority for teams running vLLM in production or shared research platforms. The main business risk is code execution from a model source despite a configured safety opt-out, which can undermine trust in AI platform controls.
Technical view
NemotronVL and KimiK25 implementation files hardcoded `trust_remote_code=True` when loading sub-components, bypassing `--trust-remote-code=False`. A malicious model repository could execute code during loading. The advisory states vLLM 0.18.0 fixes the issue.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely in AI inference environments running vLLM >=0.10.1 and <0.18.0 that load model repositories, especially using affected NemotronVL or KimiK25 code paths. Red Hat advisories are referenced, but product applicability should be confirmed per erratum.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates network reachability, low complexity, no privileges, and required user interaction, consistent with loading a malicious model repository.
Researcher notes
Primary evidence is the GitHub advisory, fix PR, and commit. CWE mappings are CWE-501 and CWE-693. The stated affected range is >=0.10.1 and <0.18.0. Do not assume broader products beyond vLLM or named vendor errata without checking those advisories.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade vLLM to version 0.18.0 or later.
Check Red Hat errata for packaged product fixes and applicability.
Restrict model loading to trusted, approved repositories.
Review pipelines that rely on `--trust-remote-code=False` as a control.
Monitor vendor advisories for additional mitigations or backports.
Validation and detection
Inventory vLLM versions in containers, notebooks, inference services, and build files.
Identify deployments using NemotronVL, KimiK25, or related model-loading paths.
Confirm affected systems are upgraded to vLLM 0.18.0 or fixed vendor builds.
Verify model-source allowlists and approval controls are enforced.
Review logs for unexpected model repository loads before remediation.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-501: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
17Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.