LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-27838: wger: IDOR via user-unscoped cache keys on routine API actions exposes workout data

wger is a free, open-source workout and fitness manager. Five routine detail action endpoints check a cache before calling `self.get_object()`. In versions up to and including 2.4, ache keys are scoped only by `pk` — no user ID is included. When a victim has previously accessed their routine via the API, an attacker can retrieve the cached response for the same PK without any ownership check. Commit e964328784e2ee2830a1991d69fadbce86ac9fbf contains a patch for the issue.

LowCVSS 3.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-27838 is a low-severity privacy flaw in wger. Under specific conditions, one logged-in user may see another user’s cached workout routine API response. The issue depends on the victim having already accessed the routine and a matching routine identifier being requested.

Executive priority

Treat as a routine privacy fix, not an emergency. Patch during the next normal maintenance window unless your wger instance stores sensitive employee, customer, or regulated wellness data, where faster remediation is appropriate.

Technical view

wger versions up to and including 2.4 use routine API cache keys scoped only by routine pk, not user. Five routine detail action endpoints check cache before self.get_object(), bypassing the normal ownership check when a matching cached response exists. The issue is CWE-639 insecure direct object reference.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to deployments of wger <= 2.4 with the affected routine API behavior enabled and caching active. Attackers require authenticated access. Confidentiality impact is limited to workout routine data; sources report no integrity or availability impact.

Exploitation context

No public source in the bundle reports active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires a logged-in attacker, a victim-cached routine response, and a matching routine identifier, which aligns with the CVSS high attack complexity rating.

Researcher notes

The core flaw is authorization bypass caused by cache lookup preceding object ownership validation. The provided sources identify five routine detail action endpoints but do not enumerate them in the bundle. Avoid assuming broader object exposure beyond routine API actions unless confirmed in code or advisory details.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade to a wger release containing commit e964328784e2ee2830a1991d69fadbce86ac9fbf.
  • If no release is available, assess applying the referenced patch per vendor guidance.
  • Prioritize instances handling sensitive personal fitness or health-adjacent data.
  • Review vendor advisory for deployment-specific remediation instructions.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory wger deployments and identify versions up to and including 2.4.
  • Confirm whether the referenced patch commit is present in deployed code.
  • Review routine API caching logic for user-scoped cache keys.
  • Check access logs for unusual authenticated access to routine detail API actions.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-639: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-27838 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.1CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N1.61.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.1Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-27838Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
wger-projectwger<= 2.4Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-639 · source CWE mapping

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.