LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-27804: Parse Server: Account takeover via JWT algorithm confusion in Google auth adapter

Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to versions 8.6.3 and 9.1.1-alpha.4, an unauthenticated attacker can forge a Google authentication token with `alg: "none"` to log in as any user linked to a Google account, without knowing their credentials. All deployments with Google authentication enabled are affected. The fix in versions 8.6.3 and 9.1.1-alpha.4 hardcodes the expected `RS256` algorithm instead of trusting the JWT header, and replaces the Google adapter's custom key fetcher with `jwks-rsa` which rejects unknown key IDs. As a workaround, dsable Google authentication until upgrading is possible.

CriticalCVSS 9.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Parse Server deployments using Google login may let an unauthenticated attacker sign in as any user who has a linked Google account. This is an account-takeover issue, not just a data leak. Organizations using Parse Server with Google authentication should treat it as urgent and prioritize upgrade or temporary disablement of Google auth.

Executive priority

High priority. This can allow direct takeover of customer or employee accounts without credentials where Google login is enabled. Patch or disable Google authentication quickly, especially for externally reachable applications.

Technical view

The Google auth adapter trusted JWT header algorithm selection. Before fixed releases, an attacker could provide a forged Google token using alg:"none" and be accepted as a linked Google user. The advisory says the fix hardcodes RS256 and replaces the custom key fetcher with jwks-rsa to reject unknown key IDs. CVSS v4.0 is 9.3 critical.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Parse Server deployments with Google authentication enabled. The source bundle lists affected versions as <8.6.3 and >=9.0.0,<9.3.1-alpha.4, while the description names 9.1.1-alpha.4 as fixed. Validate against the vendor advisory for the exact branch in use.

Exploitation context

The source states exploitation is unauthenticated, network-accessible, low-complexity, and requires no user interaction. No active exploitation is stated in the provided sources, and KEV is false. The impact is account takeover for users linked to Google accounts.

Researcher notes

The public bundle contains a version discrepancy: the description cites fixes in 8.6.3 and 9.1.1-alpha.4, while affected metadata and references point to 9.3.1-alpha.4. Use the GitHub advisory and release tags as authoritative during triage. Avoid assuming exposure if Google auth is not enabled.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Parse Server to a vendor-fixed release for your branch.
  • If upgrade cannot happen promptly, disable Google authentication temporarily.
  • Review the GitHub advisory for branch-specific fixed version guidance.
  • Prioritize internet-facing Parse Server applications using Google auth.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Parse Server versions across production, staging, and self-hosted deployments.
  • Confirm whether Google authentication is enabled in Parse Server configuration.
  • Compare installed versions against the vendor advisory and release notes.
  • After remediation, verify Google login still works with legitimate Google tokens only.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-327: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-345: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-27804 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.3CVSS 4.0CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

9.3Critical
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-27804Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
parse-communityparse-server>= 9.0.0, < 9.3.1-alpha.4, < 8.6.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-327 · source CWE mapping

Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-345 · source CWE mapping

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.