LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-27746: SPIP jeux < 4.1.1 Reflected XSS via index Parameters

The SPIP jeux plugin versions prior to 4.1.1 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the pre_propre pipeline. The plugin incorporates untrusted request parameters into HTML output without proper output encoding, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary script content into pages that render a jeux block. When a victim is induced to visit a crafted URL, the injected content is reflected into the response and executed in the victim's browser context.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-27746 is a reflected cross-site scripting issue in the SPIP jeux plugin before 4.1.1. An attacker would need to trick a user into opening a crafted link. If successful, script runs in that user’s browser on affected pages. This can expose or alter user-session data but does not directly compromise the server.

Executive priority

Treat as a normal-priority web application security fix. It requires user interaction and has limited impact, but public-facing SPIP sites with the plugin should update promptly to reduce phishing-assisted browser compromise risk.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-79 in the jeux plugin’s pre_propre pipeline. Untrusted index-related request parameters are inserted into HTML without proper output encoding on pages rendering a jeux block. CVSS 3.1 is 6.1: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges, user interaction required, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations using SPIP with the jeux plugin below version 4.1.1 may be exposed, especially where public pages render jeux blocks. Sites without the plugin, or with version 4.1.1 or later, are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV, and the provided bundle does not establish active exploitation. Public technical details and an exploit-tagged research reference are cited, so defenders should assume proof-of-concept knowledge may be available without treating this as confirmed in-the-wild exploitation.

Researcher notes

Focus review on output encoding in pre_propre handling and parameter reflection into pages containing jeux blocks. Avoid assuming impact beyond reflected XSS unless local testing shows higher privilege or session consequences. The patch commit and vendor/plugin references are the best starting points for diff-based validation.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade the SPIP jeux plugin to version 4.1.1 or later.
  • Review SPIP vendor security guidance for related platform updates.
  • Prioritize public sites where jeux blocks are rendered.
  • Use browser-side defenses as compensating controls where upgrades are delayed.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory SPIP sites and confirm whether the jeux plugin is installed.
  • Check the installed jeux plugin version against 4.1.1.
  • Identify pages that render jeux blocks and accept index parameters.
  • After upgrading, confirm the plugin reports version 4.1.1 or later.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-27746 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-27746Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SPIPjeux0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.