LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-27732: AVideo has Authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery via downloadURL in aVideoEncoder.json.php

WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. Prior to version 22.0, the `aVideoEncoder.json.php` API endpoint accepts a `downloadURL` parameter and fetches the referenced resource server-side without proper validation or an allow-list. This allows authenticated users to trigger server-side requests to arbitrary URLs (including internal network endpoints). An authenticated attacker can leverage SSRF to interact with internal services and retrieve sensitive data (e.g., internal APIs, metadata services), potentially leading to further compromise depending on the deployment environment. This issue has been fixed in AVideo version 22.0.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-27732 affects WWBN AVideo before version 22.0. A logged-in user can make the server fetch attacker-chosen URLs, potentially reaching internal systems not exposed to the internet. Business risk depends on what internal services the AVideo server can access.

Executive priority

Prioritize patching if AVideo is internet-facing, supports many user accounts, or sits in a network with sensitive internal services. The issue is high severity but requires authentication and has no cited active exploitation.

Technical view

The vulnerable aVideoEncoder.json.php endpoint accepts a downloadURL parameter and performs server-side fetching without proper validation or an allow-list. This is authenticated SSRF, CWE-918. The advisory rates it high severity with CVSS 4.0 score 8.6. Fixed in AVideo 22.0.

Likely exposure

Organizations running WWBN AVideo versions earlier than 22.0 are potentially exposed, especially where untrusted or broadly provisioned users can authenticate and where the server can reach internal APIs, cloud metadata services, or administrative interfaces.

Exploitation context

Sources describe exploitation as requiring authenticated access, low attack complexity, network reachability, and no user interaction. The bundle does not indicate CISA KEV listing or active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The source bundle identifies the vulnerable parameter and endpoint but does not provide detailed exploit telemetry. Review commit 384ef2548093f4cbb1bfac00f1f429fe57fab853 for code-level fix context and compare deployed versions against release 22.0.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade WWBN AVideo to version 22.0 or later.
  • Review the GitHub advisory and vendor release notes before deployment.
  • Restrict AVideo server egress to only required destinations.
  • Limit AVideo account access to trusted users until patched.
  • Monitor server-side outbound requests for unusual internal destinations.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory AVideo instances and confirm installed version.
  • Verify no production instance runs AVideo below 22.0.
  • Check whether aVideoEncoder.json.php is reachable to authenticated users.
  • Review logs for unexpected outbound requests from AVideo servers.
  • Assess whether AVideo servers can reach sensitive internal services.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-27732 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-27732Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
WWBNAVideo< 22.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.