NGINX Open Source and NGINX Plus have a vulnerability in the ngx_http_dav_module module that might allow an attacker to trigger a buffer overflow to the NGINX worker process; this vulnerability may result in termination of the NGINX worker process or modification of source or destination file names outside the document root. This issue affects NGINX Open Source and NGINX Plus when the configuration file uses DAV module MOVE or COPY methods, prefix location (nonregular expression location configuration), and alias directives. The integrity impact is constrained because the NGINX worker process user has low privileges and does not have access to the entire system. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This flaw affects certain NGINX WebDAV configurations. A remote attacker may be able to crash an NGINX worker process or alter source or destination filenames outside the document root. The issue is high priority where public NGINX instances use DAV MOVE or COPY with alias-based prefix locations.
Executive priority
Prioritize internet-facing NGINX systems that support WebDAV. Business risk is mainly service disruption and constrained file-name integrity impact, not full system compromise based on the provided sources.
Technical view
CVE-2026-27654 is a buffer overflow in ngx_http_dav_module. It requires a specific configuration: DAV MOVE or COPY methods, a non-regex prefix location, and alias directives. The CVSS 4.0 score is 8.8, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and high availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to NGINX Open Source or NGINX Plus deployments that enable ngx_http_dav_module and the vulnerable DAV, location, and alias configuration combination.
Exploitation context
The bundle does not identify active exploitation, and KEV is false. The CVSS vector indicates remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity attack conditions if the vulnerable configuration is present.
Researcher notes
The vulnerable condition is configuration-dependent. Integrity impact is described as constrained because the NGINX worker user has low privileges. The source bundle does not provide proof-of-concept details, precise fixed upstream versions, or evidence of exploitation.
Mitigation direction
Review F5 guidance for affected NGINX Open Source and NGINX Plus versions.
Apply F5 or distribution security updates where applicable.
Check Red Hat RHSA advisories if using Red Hat-packaged NGINX.
Disable or redesign the vulnerable DAV MOVE/COPY plus alias configuration where feasible.
Restrict WebDAV exposure while vendor remediation is pending.
Validation and detection
Inventory NGINX Open Source and NGINX Plus deployments.
Check whether ngx_http_dav_module is enabled or built into deployed instances.
Inspect configs for DAV MOVE or COPY methods with prefix locations and alias directives.
Confirm whether deployed versions match F5 or distribution affected-version guidance.
Verify updated packages against F5 or Red Hat advisory status.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-120 · source CWE mapping
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.