LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-27635: Manyfold vulnerable to OS command injection via ZIP filename in f3d render

Manyfold is an open source, self-hosted web application for managing a collection of 3d models, particularly focused on 3d printing. Prior to version 0.133.0, when model render generation is enabled, a logged-in user can achieve RCE by uploading a ZIP containing a file with a shell metacharacter in its name. The filename reaches a Ruby backtick call unsanitized. Version 0.133.0 fixes the issue.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-27635 affects Manyfold, a self-hosted 3D model management application. Before version 0.133.0, an authenticated user could trigger remote code execution when model render generation is enabled by uploading a ZIP with a specially crafted filename. This is high priority for organizations exposing Manyfold to untrusted users or broad internal user groups.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority application update where Manyfold is used with uploads enabled. The business risk is authenticated remote code execution, potentially compromising the host and stored model data. Prioritize internet-facing or partner-accessible deployments first.

Technical view

Manyfold versions before 0.133.0 are vulnerable to OS command injection (CWE-78). The reported flaw occurs when a ZIP-uploaded filename containing shell metacharacters reaches a Ruby backtick call unsanitized during f3d render generation. CVSS is 7.5 high: network reachable, low privileges required, high attack complexity, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to Manyfold deployments below 0.133.0 where model render generation is enabled and users can log in and upload ZIP model archives. Risk is higher if accounts are easy to obtain, shared broadly, or available to semi-trusted external collaborators.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not indicate active exploitation, and this CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires a logged-in user and the vulnerable render-generation path. Successful exploitation could execute operating system commands in the context of the Manyfold application environment.

Researcher notes

Key conditions are authenticated access, ZIP upload capability, render generation enabled, and Manyfold before 0.133.0. The vulnerable data flow is filename handling into a Ruby backtick call. Public sources identify the fix version but do not provide evidence of active exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Manyfold to version 0.133.0 or later.
  • Review the GitHub advisory and release notes for vendor-specific guidance.
  • If upgrade is delayed, assess disabling model render generation per vendor guidance.
  • Restrict Manyfold accounts and upload permissions to trusted users only.

Validation and detection

  • Identify all Manyfold instances and record deployed versions.
  • Confirm whether any instance runs a version earlier than 0.133.0.
  • Check whether model render generation is enabled.
  • Review who can log in and upload ZIP model archives.
  • Confirm remediation by verifying Manyfold reports version 0.133.0 or later.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-27635 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.65.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-27635Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
manyfold3dmanyfold< 0.133.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.