LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-27623: Valkey has Pre-Authentication DOS from malformed RESP request

Valkey is a distributed key-value database. Starting in version 9.0.0 and prior to version 9.0.3, a malicious actor with network access to Valkey can cause the system to abort by triggering an assertion. When processing incoming requests, the Valkey system does not properly reset the networking state after processing an empty request. A malicious actor can then send a request that the server incorrectly identifies as breaking server side invariants, which results in the server shutting down. Version 9.0.3 fixes the issue. As an additional mitigation, properly isolate Valkey deployments so that only trusted users have access.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Valkey servers running 9.0.0 through 9.0.2 can be crashed remotely before authentication if an attacker can reach the service. The bug is an availability issue, not data theft or data change, but it can interrupt applications that depend on Valkey. Valkey 9.0.3 fixes it.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or broadly reachable Valkey services because a remote unauthenticated crash can cause outages. Internal, tightly isolated deployments are lower urgency but should still be upgraded during the next controlled maintenance window.

Technical view

The issue is improper networking state reset after an empty request. A subsequent malformed RESP request can be interpreted as violating server-side invariants, triggering an assertion and aborting the server process. CVSS 7.5 reflects network reachability, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to valkey-io Valkey versions >=9.0.0 and <9.0.3. Risk is highest where Valkey is reachable from untrusted networks, shared tenant networks, or any client population not fully trusted. The source bundle does not identify other affected products.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability is pre-authentication and network reachable, so access control is the key boundary. The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and KEV is false. No exploit maturity details are provided beyond the vulnerability mechanics and CVSS vector.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on version range, reachability, and process-abort evidence. The root cause combines malformed RESP request handling with stale networking state after an empty request, resulting in CWE-20 and CWE-617 conditions. Avoid proof-of-concept testing against production services.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Valkey deployments to version 9.0.3 or later.
  • Restrict Valkey network access to trusted clients only.
  • Isolate Valkey deployments from public and untrusted networks.
  • Review vendor and distribution guidance for package-specific remediation status.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Valkey instances and record exact versions.
  • Confirm no production instance runs Valkey 9.0.0 through 9.0.2.
  • Review network paths to ensure only trusted clients can reach Valkey.
  • Check operational logs for unexpected Valkey aborts or restarts.
  • Track Red Hat or vendor status if using packaged Valkey builds.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-617: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-27623 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6GitHub_M
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-27623Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPValkey: Valkey: Denial of Service via specially crafted network requests
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-02-23T21:02:18.785Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-02-23T19:43:45.736Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
valkey-iovalkey>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.3Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-617 · source CWE mapping

Reachable Assertion

Reachable Assertion represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.