LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-27609: Parse Dashboard Missing CSRF Protection on Agent Endpoint

Parse Dashboard is a standalone dashboard for managing Parse Server apps. In versions 7.3.0-alpha.42 through 9.0.0-alpha.7, the AI Agent API endpoint (`POST /apps/:appId/agent`) lacks CSRF protection. An attacker can craft a malicious page that, when visited by an authenticated dashboard user, submits requests to the agent endpoint using the victim's session. The fix in version 9.0.0-alpha.8 adds CSRF middleware to the agent endpoint and embeds a CSRF token in the dashboard page. As a workaround, remove the `agent` configuration block from your dashboard configuration. Dashboards without an `agent` config are not affected.

HighCVSS 8.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Parse Dashboard alpha releases can let a malicious website make an authenticated administrator’s browser send unintended AI Agent API requests. This requires the user to visit attacker-controlled content while signed in. Dashboards without the agent configuration are not affected. The vendor fixed this in 9.0.0-alpha.8.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority where Parse Dashboard alpha builds with agent enabled are used. Business urgency is highest for internet-accessible administrative dashboards or environments where administrators browse untrusted sites while authenticated.

Technical view

CVE-2026-27609 is missing CSRF protection on Parse Dashboard’s POST /apps/:appId/agent endpoint in versions 7.3.0-alpha.42 through before 9.0.0-alpha.8. The fix adds CSRF middleware to the agent endpoint and embeds a CSRF token in the dashboard page. CVSS v4.0 is 8.3, mapped to CWE-352.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Parse Dashboard deployments running affected alpha versions with an agent configuration block enabled. The issue depends on an authenticated dashboard user interacting with malicious content. Dashboards without agent config are stated as not affected.

Exploitation context

The source describes a CSRF scenario requiring user interaction and an authenticated dashboard session. The bundle does not indicate known active exploitation, and KEV status is false. No public exploit status is established by the provided sources.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest from the GitHub security advisory and 9.0.0-alpha.8 release reference. The affected range and workaround are explicit. The provided sources do not document exploitation in the wild, broad version impact beyond alpha releases, or additional mitigations.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Parse Dashboard to 9.0.0-alpha.8 or later per vendor advisory.
  • If upgrade is not immediate, remove the agent configuration block.
  • Prioritize dashboards reachable by administrators from normal browsing environments.
  • Monitor vendor advisory and release notes for additional guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Parse Dashboard versions across environments.
  • Confirm whether the dashboard configuration includes an agent block.
  • Verify affected deployments are upgraded to 9.0.0-alpha.8 or later.
  • Confirm CSRF protection is present on the agent endpoint after remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-27609 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.3CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.3High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-27609Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
parse-communityparse-dashboard>= 7.3.0-alpha.42, < 9.0.0-alpha.8Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.