LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-27152: DIscourse has DM communication-preference bypass when adding members

Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, DM communication-preference bypass when adding members via `Chat::AddUsersToChannel` — a user could add targets who have blocked/ignored/muted them to an existing DM channel, bypassing per-recipient PM restrictions that are enforced during DM channel creation. Versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 patch the issue. No known workarounds are available.

LowCVSS 1.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a low-severity privacy and abuse-control issue in Discourse direct messages. A logged-in user could add someone to an existing DM channel even if that person blocked, ignored, or muted them. It bypasses recipient communication preferences, but does not indicate system takeover, data destruction, or broad compromise.

Executive priority

Treat as a routine but privacy-relevant update. Prioritize for communities where harassment controls, moderation trust, or regulated user communications matter. It is not presented as an emergency infrastructure risk.

Technical view

Discourse before 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 has an access-control flaw in Chat::AddUsersToChannel. PM restrictions are enforced when creating a DM channel, but not when adding members later. The advisory maps this to CWE-284 and CVSS 4.0 score 1.3 low.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Discourse sites running affected versions with chat or DM functionality where authenticated users can add members to DM channels. The main impact is unwanted contact and preference bypass, not infrastructure compromise.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires a logged-in user and targets the application’s DM membership workflow rather than server code execution.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE record and Discourse GitHub advisory. The issue is a logic authorization gap between DM creation and later member addition. No workaround, exploit publication, or active exploitation is cited in the provided sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Discourse to 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, 2026.2.0, or later as applicable.
  • Review the GitHub advisory for any newly published operational guidance.
  • If immediate upgrade is delayed, monitor DM abuse reports closely; no workaround is listed.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the running Discourse version against the fixed versions listed in the advisory.
  • Review user reports or moderation logs for unwanted DM channel additions.
  • Verify communication-preference controls after upgrading in a test or staging environment.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-27152 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
1.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
1.3CVSS 4.0LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U——Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

1.3Low
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2026-27152Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
discoursediscourse< 2025.12.2, >= 2026.1.0-latest, < 2026.1.1, >= 2026.2.0-latest, < 2026.2.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.