LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-2635: MLflow Use of Default Password Authentication Bypass Vulnerability

MLflow Use of Default Password Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of MLflow. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the basic_auth.ini file. The file contains hard-coded default credentials. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary code in the context of the administrator. Was ZDI-CAN-28256.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

MLflow 3.4.0 contains hard-coded default credentials in its basic authentication configuration. A remote attacker may bypass authentication and gain administrator-level code execution if an affected installation is reachable. This is business-critical where MLflow manages models, experiments, credentials, or production AI workflows.

Executive priority

Treat this as urgent for any organization using MLflow 3.4.0. The risk is direct administrative compromise of an AI/ML platform, but current evidence does not prove active exploitation.

Technical view

The reported flaw is in MLflow's basic_auth.ini, which contains hard-coded default credentials. ZDI states authentication is not required and successful exploitation can execute arbitrary code as administrator. The source bundle identifies MLflow 3.4.0 as affected; broader version impact is not established here.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely for organizations running MLflow 3.4.0, especially instances reachable from internal networks, VPN users, or the internet. The provided evidence does not confirm other affected versions or downstream packages.

Exploitation context

The CVSS score is 9.8 with network, low-complexity, no-privilege exploitation characteristics. The bundle marks KEV as false, and no cited source in the bundle confirms active exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strong for the described flaw and severity, but incomplete for version range, fixed release, and exploitation telemetry. Do not assume products beyond MLflow 3.4.0 are affected without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all MLflow deployments and prioritize version 3.4.0 immediately.
  • Review the vendor PR and advisories for confirmed fixed versions or configuration guidance.
  • Remove or rotate any unchanged default basic authentication credentials.
  • Limit MLflow access to trusted networks while remediation is validated.
  • Monitor for unexpected administrator actions or code execution activity.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether MLflow 3.4.0 is deployed in production, staging, or research environments.
  • Check basic_auth.ini for hard-coded or unchanged default credentials.
  • Verify MLflow administrative interfaces are not exposed to untrusted networks.
  • Review MLflow and platform logs for unexpected administrator access.
  • Track Red Hat, CVE, ZDI, and MLflow updates for scope changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1393: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-798: Credential and account abuse lookup

Authentication and credential weaknesses can make valid-account abuse and credential telemetry useful review starting points. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-2635 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.0CriticalCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9zdi
7.3CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L3.93.4redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.3High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-2635Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPmlflow: MLflow Use of Default Password Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-02-20T23:01:16.144Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-02-20T22:25:03.494Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MLflowMLflow3.4.0unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1393 · source CWE mapping

Use of Default Password

Use of Default Password represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-798 · source CWE mapping

Use of Hard-coded Credentials

Use of Hard-coded Credentials represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.