LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-26234: JUNG Smart Visu Server - Improper Neutralization of HTTP Headers for Scripting Syntax

JUNG Smart Visu Server 1.1.1050 contains a request header manipulation vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to override request URLs by injecting arbitrary values in the X-Forwarded-Host header. Attackers can manipulate proxied requests to generate tainted responses, enabling cache poisoning, potential phishing, and redirecting users to malicious domains.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-26234 affects JUNG Smart Visu Server versions listed in the advisory. An unauthenticated attacker can abuse the X-Forwarded-Host HTTP header so the server generates responses using attacker-controlled hostnames. This can support cache poisoning, phishing, or redirects to malicious domains. User interaction is required, but the issue is remotely reachable and rated high severity.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority exposure review for any internet-facing or user-accessible Smart Visu Server. The main business risks are user deception, malicious redirects, and poisoned cached content. Prioritize inventory, access restriction, proxy hardening, and vendor guidance review.

Technical view

The flaw is improper neutralization of HTTP header content, mapped to CWE-644. In JUNG Smart Visu Server 1.1.1050, 1.0.905, 1.0.832, and 1.0.830, arbitrary X-Forwarded-Host values can override request URL handling in proxied requests, producing tainted responses. CVSS is 8.8, AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where JUNG Smart Visu Server is reachable by users or the internet and sits behind proxies or caches that trust forwarded host headers. Publicly accessible deployments, building automation portals, and environments with shared caches may face higher business impact.

Exploitation context

The sources describe unauthenticated remote header manipulation requiring user interaction. They mention cache poisoning, phishing, and redirection risks. The provided data does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation, so active exploitation should not be assumed.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to CVE metadata and third-party advisories in the source bundle. No exploit code, active exploitation confirmation, or vendor patch details are provided here. Focus validation on affected version presence, proxy trust configuration, cache behavior, and whether responses incorporate attacker-controlled host header values.

Mitigation direction

  • Check JUNG or trusted advisory sources for an official fixed version or mitigation.
  • Inventory Smart Visu Server deployments and identify listed affected versions.
  • Restrict external access to Smart Visu Server where operationally possible.
  • Review proxy and cache handling of X-Forwarded-Host headers.
  • Avoid trusting client-supplied forwarded host headers unless explicitly validated.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether deployed versions match 1.1.1050, 1.0.905, 1.0.832, or 1.0.830.
  • Review reverse proxy configuration for forwarded host header trust boundaries.
  • Inspect logs for unusual hostnames in X-Forwarded-Host headers.
  • Test safely in a controlled environment for response generation using unexpected host values.
  • Verify any vendor-recommended update or configuration change after applying it.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-644: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-26234 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-26234Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ALBRECHT JUNG GMBH & CO. KGJUNG Smart Visu Server1.1.1050, 1.0.905, 1.0.832, 1.0.830Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-644 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of HTTP Headers for Scripting Syntax

Improper Neutralization of HTTP Headers for Scripting Syntax represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.