newbee-mall stores and verifies user passwords using an unsalted MD5 hashing algorithm. The implementation does not incorporate per-user salts or computational cost controls, enabling attackers who obtain password hashes through database exposure, backup leakage, or other compromise vectors to rapidly recover plaintext credentials via offline attacks.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
newbee-mall 1.0.0 stores user passwords with unsalted MD5. If attackers obtain the password database or backups, they can try passwords offline at high speed and may recover user credentials. The public sources do not show active exploitation or a confirmed vendor patch.
Executive priority
Treat this as urgent if newbee-mall 1.0.0 is deployed or if password-hash data may have been exposed. The main business risk is account takeover after any database or backup compromise, not confirmed internet-scale exploitation.
Technical view
The vulnerability is CWE-327: use of a broken cryptographic algorithm for password storage. The issue is unsalted MD5 without per-user salts or computational cost controls, creating high risk after hash disclosure. Sources identify newbee-ltd newbee-mall version 1.0.0; default status for other versions is unknown.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most relevant to organizations running newbee-mall 1.0.0 with its built-in password storage, especially where databases, backups, logs, or exports containing password hashes may be accessible or leaked.
Exploitation context
No KEV listing is reported in the bundle, and no cited source confirms active exploitation. Practical abuse requires obtaining password hashes through another exposure path, then recovering weak passwords offline and reusing them against accounts.
Researcher notes
This is a password-storage weakness rather than a standalone remote takeover. The CVSS score is critical, but the described attack depends on hash access. Evidence is incomplete for patch status, affected versions beyond 1.0.0, and real-world exploitation.
Mitigation direction
Inventory newbee-mall deployments and confirm whether version 1.0.0 is in use.
Review the GitHub issue and VulnCheck advisory for vendor guidance or fixed releases.
Restrict access to databases, backups, exports, and logs containing password hashes.
Replace unsalted MD5 with vendor-supported salted, work-factor password hashing when available.
After safe password storage is deployed, require password resets for affected users.
Monitor for suspicious logins and credential reuse against exposed accounts.
Validation and detection
Confirm the application version and whether password verification uses unsalted MD5.
Check whether stored password hashes include unique per-user salts and cost controls.
Review database and backup access history for possible hash exposure.
Verify whether upstream has published a fix or migration guidance.
Assess whether affected user credentials were reused across other systems.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-327: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-327 · source CWE mapping
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.