LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-2569: Dear Flipbook <= 2.4.20 - Authenticated (Auhtor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via PDF Page Labels

The Dear Flipbook – PDF Flipbook, 3D Flipbook, PDF embed, PDF viewer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via PDF page labels in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.20 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

MediumCVSS 6.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-2569 affects the Dear Flipbook WordPress plugin through version 2.4.20. A logged-in user with Author-level access or higher could store malicious script in PDF page labels. That script may run when someone views the affected page, creating risk to site users and administrators.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority WordPress application risk. Prioritize sites with many content contributors, public registration, contractors, or shared Author accounts. This is not reported as actively exploited, but stored XSS can support account abuse and site trust damage.

Technical view

This is a stored cross-site scripting issue in Dear Flipbook caused by insufficient input sanitization and output escaping for PDF page labels. The CVSS 3.1 score is 6.4. The attack requires authenticated low-privilege access, is network reachable, and can affect confidentiality and integrity in the user’s browser context.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on WordPress sites using Dear Flipbook up to and including version 2.4.20, especially sites allowing Authors or similar roles to create or manage flipbook/PDF content.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not state active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked as CISA KEV. Exploitation requires an authenticated Author-level or higher account, reducing internet-wide risk but increasing concern for multi-user WordPress sites.

Researcher notes

Primary evidence comes from the CVE description, Wordfence reference, and WordPress plugin changeset. The affected metadata in the bundle appears incomplete, while the narrative states all versions up to 2.4.20 are affected. No specific fixed version is named in the provided bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify WordPress sites using Dear Flipbook.
  • Check whether the installed version is within the vulnerable range.
  • Update according to the plugin vendor or WordPress plugin repository guidance.
  • Restrict Author-level access to trusted users only.
  • Review existing flipbook/PDF content for unexpected script-like content.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm Dear Flipbook version on each WordPress site.
  • Verify no vulnerable versions remain installed.
  • Review user roles with Author privileges or higher.
  • Check whether PDF page labels contain unexpected markup.
  • Monitor WordPress security logs for suspicious content changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-2569 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N3.12.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-2569Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
dearhiveDear Flipbook – PDF Flipbook, 3D Flipbook, PDF embed, PDF viewer0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.