LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-25310: WordPress Extend Link plugin <= 2.0.0 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Alobaidi Extend Link extend-link allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Extend Link: from n/a through <= 2.0.0.

MediumCVSS 4.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-25310 is a medium-severity SSRF issue in the WordPress Extend Link plugin through version 2.0.0. A logged-in attacker may be able to make the website send unintended server-side requests. Business urgency depends on whether the plugin is installed and what internal services the WordPress server can reach.

Executive priority

Prioritize identification first. Treat affected internet-facing WordPress sites as moderate risk, especially where many users can log in or the server can reach sensitive internal systems. Escalate if vendor guidance confirms no patch and the plugin is required.

Technical view

The issue is classified as CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery in Alobaidi Extend Link. CVSS 3.1 is 4.9: network attack vector, high complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact, and no availability impact. Public sources do not provide endpoint-level details or a named fixed version.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running the Extend Link plugin at versions up to and including 2.0.0. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires an authenticated low-privilege user and is not a browser-click issue.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not indicate active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked as CISA KEV. The high attack complexity rating suggests exploitation may depend on environmental conditions, such as reachable internal resources or plugin configuration.

Researcher notes

Public detail is sparse. The record names SSRF but does not describe the vulnerable parameter, endpoint, prerequisites beyond CVSS, or a fix. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond authenticated, high-complexity network access. Validation should focus on asset/version exposure and safe log review.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Extend Link plugin and record installed versions.
  • Check the plugin vendor, WordPress.org, or Patchstack for fixed-version guidance.
  • Update the plugin if a vendor-supported fixed version is available.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is not business-critical.
  • Limit WordPress server egress to internal services where feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Extend Link is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Verify installed plugin versions against the affected range: through 2.0.0.
  • Review user roles; note that low-privilege authenticated access is relevant.
  • Check web and application logs for unusual server-initiated outbound requests.
  • Monitor vendor and vulnerability database pages for remediation updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-25310 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N1.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-25310Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
AlobaidiExtend Linkextend-link, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.