LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-25223: Fastify's Content-Type header tab character allows body validation bypass

Fastify is a fast and low overhead web framework, for Node.js. Prior to version 5.7.2, a validation bypass vulnerability exists in Fastify where request body validation schemas specified by Content-Type can be completely circumvented. By appending a tab character (\t) followed by arbitrary content to the Content-Type header, attackers can bypass body validation while the server still processes the body as the original content type. This issue has been patched in version 5.7.2.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Fastify versions before 5.7.2 can be tricked into accepting a request body without applying the intended validation rules. For affected public APIs, this can let invalid or unsafe data reach application logic, creating business risk around data integrity and downstream processing.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for public or partner-facing Fastify APIs because the bug undermines application validation controls. If Fastify is only used internally with limited trust boundaries, urgency is lower but still appropriate for normal high-severity patch timelines.

Technical view

The issue affects Fastify < 5.7.2. A Content-Type header modified with a tab and extra content can cause body validation schemas selected by Content-Type to be bypassed while parsing still treats the body as the original type. CVSS 7.5 reflects network, unauthenticated exploitation with high integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely in Node.js services running Fastify before 5.7.2, especially APIs that rely on request body schemas for JSON or other typed payload validation. Transitive use through packaged platforms or Red Hat-distributed components should be checked against vendor advisories.

Exploitation context

The provided bundle does not show KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Public advisory and HackerOne references indicate the behavior is documented. Treat this as remotely reachable where affected Fastify endpoints accept request bodies, but do not assume exploitation without logs or vendor evidence.

Researcher notes

Focus analysis on parser-versus-validator Content-Type handling. The key question is whether routes depend on Content-Type-specific body schemas. Evidence supports a fixed upstream version, but the bundle does not prove exploitation, affected downstream products beyond listed references, or complete mitigation alternatives.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Fastify to version 5.7.2 or later.
  • Check Red Hat advisories if Fastify is consumed through Red Hat products.
  • Inventory direct and transitive Fastify dependencies across Node.js services.
  • Review vendor guidance before applying nonstandard workarounds.
  • Prioritize internet-facing APIs that rely on request body validation.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm package lockfiles and SBOMs do not contain Fastify < 5.7.2.
  • Verify deployed containers or runtimes use the patched dependency version.
  • Add regression tests for abnormal Content-Type values and schema enforcement.
  • Review API logs for unusual Content-Type headers on body-bearing requests.
  • Confirm validation failures still occur for malformed request bodies.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
12

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-179: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-436: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-25223 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
13Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N3.93.6GitHub_M
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N3.93.6redhat-SADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-25223Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPFastify: Fastify: Validation bypass due to malformed Content-Type header leading to integrity impact
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-02-03T22:01:19.884Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-02-03T21:21:40.268Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
fastifyfastify< 5.7.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-179 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Behavior Order: Early Validation

Incorrect Behavior Order: Early Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-436 · source CWE mapping

Interpretation Conflict

Interpretation Conflict represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.