LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-25211: Llama Stack (aka llama-stack) before 0.4.0rc3 does not censor the pgvector password in the initialization log.

Llama Stack (aka llama-stack) before 0.4.0rc3 does not censor the pgvector password in the initialization log.

LowCVSS 3.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Llama Stack before 0.4.0rc3 may write the pgvector database password into initialization logs. The main business risk is credential exposure through log access, backups, or log aggregation. The published severity is low, and there is no cited evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted credential-hygiene issue, not an emergency vulnerability. Prioritize systems where logs are widely accessible or centralized. Upgrade and rotate credentials if log exposure is plausible.

Technical view

CVE-2026-25211 is a CWE-532 sensitive-information-in-log issue in llama-stack. The CVE states versions before 0.4.0rc3 do not censor the pgvector password in initialization logging. CVSS 3.1 is 3.2, with local attack vector, high complexity, scope changed, and low confidentiality impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where affected llama-stack deployments use pgvector and initialization logs are retained, aggregated, broadly accessible, or shipped to third-party logging systems. Systems not using affected pre-0.4.0rc3 versions, or without pgvector password logging, are less likely exposed.

Exploitation context

No KEV listing or cited source indicates active exploitation. Abuse would depend on access to initialization logs containing the pgvector password. The CVSS vector indicates local access and high complexity, limiting broad remote exploitation concerns.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description and upstream GitHub references. The affected statement says before 0.4.0rc3, while the structured affected data is sparse. Validate against the upstream diff and local deployment behavior.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade llama-stack to 0.4.0rc3 or later where feasible.
  • Review vendor pull request and release comparison for the exact logging change.
  • Rotate the pgvector password if affected initialization logs may be exposed.
  • Restrict access to retained application logs and log aggregation platforms.
  • Purge or redact affected historical logs according to retention requirements.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory llama-stack deployments and identify versions before 0.4.0rc3.
  • Determine whether deployments use pgvector with password-based authentication.
  • Review initialization logs for accidental pgvector password disclosure.
  • Confirm updated versions censor the pgvector password during initialization.
  • Check whether exposed logs were forwarded, backed up, or shared externally.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-532: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-25211 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.2CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N1.41.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.2Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-25211Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
llamastackLlama Stack0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-532 · source CWE mapping

Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File

Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.