LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2026-25210: In libexpat before 2.7.4, the doContent function does not properly determine the buffer size bufSize becaus...

In libexpat before 2.7.4, the doContent function does not properly determine the buffer size bufSize because there is no integer overflow check for tag buffer reallocation.

MediumCVSS 6.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2026-25210 is an integer overflow issue in libexpat's XML parsing code before 2.7.4. A crafted local input could cause incorrect memory handling with potential confidentiality and integrity impact. The CVSS vector is local and high complexity, so urgency is moderate unless libexpat processes untrusted local files in sensitive workflows.

Executive priority

Schedule remediation through normal vulnerability management, with faster action for systems handling untrusted XML or sensitive data. No active exploitation is cited, but confidentiality and integrity impacts justify tracking and patching affected dependencies.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-190 in libexpat's doContent function. tag buffer reallocation does not properly check integer overflow when determining bufSize. The CVSS 3.1 score is 6.9: local attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, unchanged scope, high confidentiality and integrity impact, and low availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely where applications, appliances, or embedded products include libexpat before 2.7.4 and parse XML from local or staged inputs. The source bundle names libexpat and references a Siemens advisory, but it does not enumerate affected Siemens products here.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. The CVSS vector is local and high complexity, which limits broad remote exploitation assumptions. Treat this as a dependency risk until vendor advisories confirm exposure in deployed products.

Researcher notes

The public record is sparse in the bundle. The key technical clue is missing integer-overflow checking during tag buffer reallocation in doContent. Avoid assuming affected downstream products beyond referenced advisories unless vendor-specific evidence confirms bundling and vulnerable versions.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade libexpat to 2.7.4 or later where directly managed.
  • Track vendor advisories for products bundling libexpat.
  • Prioritize systems parsing untrusted XML in sensitive workflows.
  • Apply vendor-supplied updates for downstream appliances or software.
  • If updates are unavailable, restrict untrusted XML processing where feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory applications and devices that bundle libexpat.
  • Confirm deployed libexpat versions are 2.7.4 or later.
  • Review SBOMs and vendor advisories for transitive exposure.
  • Check whether XML inputs are local-only, staged, or user-controlled.
  • Document compensating controls when vendor fixes are pending.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2026-25210 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L1.45.5mitre

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2026-25210Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
siemens-SADPADP container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
libexpat projectlibexpat0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-190 · source CWE mapping

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.